The saddest thing and Democracy in the US
March 1, 2013
The saddest thing and Democracy in the US
One of the saddest things I saw on the news a couple of days ago was a father in the US with his six or seven year old son teaching him the finer points of holding a gun and learn to shoot. When asked a few questions, this little boy just parroted the father’s mantra of ‘pride in his country’ and freedom to ‘defend’. This poor little boy.
Another man proudly stated he had about 14 guns and was buying more. He was shown to shoot at clay pigeons together with a woman who also was a great believer in being ‘prepared’.
There is something very odd about how a country which prides itself of being at the forefront of democracy yet is now desperately fighting to retain a right which to me is proof of the opposite, an apparent inability to listen and take action against an evil opposing democracy. The right to bear arms back in 1875 or earlier has nothing to do with hundreds of millions owning assault weapon and guns. The British have long gone and left, so have naughty Indians and Cowboys.
There is no way that a country that has more firearms belonging to its citizens than their daily needs for loaves of bread or protective roofs over their heads can still belong to the pool of countries of the true democratic world. It just doesn’t add up when guns generally are for detaining or locking away freedom. Has the US become a Liberia or Sierra Leone? How far is it removed from rampaging citizens roaming the streets looking for kills? There are already 30 000 people dying of guns a year. It is just staggering.
Has anyone seen the footage lately of enormous exhibition halls, the size of cathedrals, holding gun shows? Row after row of sinister black assault rifles, all displayed in its macabre magnificence, gleaming and with glistening erect barrels ready to ejaculate its deadly load towards the perceived loathsome enemy, seemingly lurking everywhere around US’ wholesome societies corners. Last time it were the 20 children of Sandy Hook that were the ‘enemy’ together with 6 adults. Who knows where the next enemies might be hiding; in hospitals, churches, or more schools? At the gun shows there were hundreds and thousands of guns all shown as exhibited like up- market fashion items. Prospective buyers were seen to lovingly stroke and caress the naked barrels, murmuring sweet nothingness in their dark crevices of silencers and bullet magazines. .
With 30 000 shot dead annually, all one can say is,’ if believing that in the US citizens must be armed against the enemy, it follows also there must be lots of enemies in the US.’ You just can’t have it both ways. “We need guns to defend ourselves, but they are hardly ever used because in the US there are no enemies”, or,” we need guns because we are surrounded by danger and enemies are everywhere we turn”. ” At every step we take we might face our enemy and danger. Watch out or you’ll get shot so… get a good and faster gun and shoot first”.
It all sounds ridiculous and doesn’t make sense. There are now hordes of women buying guns with Prada and Bling being the main reason. Gun shops are run off their feet and everyone is onto more guns, hundreds of millions of them. The gun lobby now seems to dictate the country and I saw one man loading up his car with ammo and guns. He smiled into the camera almost expecting to be canonized for his foray into a frenzied shooting-out campaign against the enemy.
It’s clear that the NRA does everything in its power to whip up the hysteria and fear of enemies. They even advice that schools ought to arm themselves with a ‘good guy with a good gun.’ Is that democracy?
I am speechless.
Tags: Bling, British, Democracy, Guns, Liberia, Prada, Sandy Hook, Sierra Leone, US Posted in Gerard Oosterman |

When I was in the States, last year, our bus driver was fascinated that his Australian, Kiwi and Scottish passengers didn’t/haven’t/never will own guns. We asked how many he owned. Nine was the reply, but the only essential one was the big caliber, semi automatic that he kept in the car. Evidently, essential, just in case some ass-hole tries to hijack the car. This made him feel safe, even though, as we all pointed out, he ran the risk of taking the life of another.
Yes, the bloody constitution, like the Holy of Holies to a Jew, or the transubstantiated wafer of the Catholic, Holy, immutable, straight from God, Himself!
LikeLike
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-magrath/gun-control-debate_b_2389047.html
The HP article presents a view of increased regulation, but of perhaps particular interest includes a discussion about the Constitutiion. It includes a link to a wikipedia discussion about the gun statistics and to an interesting abstract of an Australian study published in June 1996.
LikeLike
Don’t know why they continue to compare guns to cars, as both manage to kill people, but, out of the two, only the gun is actually made to kill people, whereas, death by motor vehicle is almost always due to misuse. Interesting that Florida has tightened up gun ownership laws, without breaching the constitution.
LikeLike
It is the nature of this particular article that it discusses cars.
I feel unambiguously so sorry for the milions upon millions of rational Americans who do not want the guns anymore than it seems a majority of Australians do. 😦
LikeLike
You should have asked him what would happen if someone stole his car?
LikeLike
And what is there favourite phrase – God Bless America !
LikeLike
Guns & Bibles
LikeLike
T’other night I was watching Heartbreak Kid (Ben Stiller) and his dad who is helping him try to win back the woman he loves drives him up to her door where she lives with her mum and dad and assorted family members (and where the lead has never been before)…and his dad warns ‘Now be careful! This is the Bible Belt. They’ve got guns.’
LikeLike
The US has a rate of ownership something like 88.8 guns per 100 people. That means there’s a staggering 270 million guns in private ownership there. What is concerning is the amount of semi-automatic guns that are in private ownership. The comparative list below makes for sobering reading.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/nation/gun-homicides-ownership/table/
LikeLike
Gerard: Excellent article and also very sad. These multitudes of gun-owners have such a false sense of security. I remember watching Michael Moore’s documentary some years ago called “Bowling for Columbine” which he made after the Columbine High School Massacre. The documentary didn’t answer any questions but certainly verified a side of America that we had heard about. As for the N.R.A. – well……………….that’s a story in itself.
LikeLike
The constitution and second amendment originated in England and in fact is more or less a copy dating back to the 17Th century. Yet, England abolished that part of the constitution and have no trouble that not everyone needs to own multitude of guns and assault weapons.
LikeLike
Yes, Rosie, the only thing that is likely to happen if you keep a gun at home, is that you will probably kill yourself, or a loved one with it.
LikeLike
I’m Canadian. I don’t understand this mentality at all. Very sad for the US.
LikeLike
It is the notion of democracy and allowing murder and mayhem to flourish and encourage through gun ownership that I find contradictory.
LikeLike
If democracy means the ability to go to hell in your own hand basket, the answer to your question is yes.
However, the American people shouldn’t cry rape when another lunatic kills a swag of people and children. They should accept the fact that they are all with blood-stained hands. Don’t talk it, do it; should be their motto.
LikeLike
The US style of democracy is terminal, no escape, except through a solid renovation and overhaul of their constitution.
LikeLike
I first thought that the second picture was taken in America…could be, but on closer look it might just be somewhere in Africa.
LikeLike