This piece has been taken direct from the provided link. It seems a reasonable way to go forward if we still feel that the Pig’s Arms has a future.
So far the P/A has had a fairly reasonable run but the moderation has been almost non- existent. Most blogs insist on real names and do not accept language that is insulting or use expletives s.a fuck, cunt etc. It just shows lack of literacy and courtesy.
“If you act with consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Take some responsibility for the quality of the conversations in which you participate. Help make this an intelligent place for discussion.
•We welcome debate and dissent, but personal attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain the conversation.com service as an inviting space to focus on intelligent discussions. Be courteous.
•We acknowledge criticism of the articles we publish. But for the sake of robust debate, we will distinguish between constructive, focused argument and smear tactics.
•We require real names. Contributors who want to comment must use their real names when signing up for an account on The Conversation. Organisation representatives creating accounts also must use their own names. Requiring real names helps us maintain a transparent and credible forum for discussion and debate. We reserve the right to delete
comments made from profiles with partial names or aliases.
•We understand that people often feel strongly about issues debated on the site, but we will consider removing any content that others might find extremely offensive or threatening. Please respect other people’s views and beliefs and consider your impact on others when making your contribution.
•We reserve the right to curtail conversations and refuse access. We don’t want to stop people discussing topics they are enthusiastic about, but we do ask users to find ways of sharing their views that do not feel divisive, threatening or toxic to others. Personal attacks are a direct violation of these guidelines and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of The Conversation service.
•We will not tolerate racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia or other forms of discriminatory language or contributions that could be interpreted as such.
•We will remove any content that may put us in legal jeopardy, such as potentially defamatory postings, or material posted in potential breach of copyright.
•We will remove any posts that are obviously commercial or otherwise spam-like. Our aim is that this site should provide a space for people to interact with our content and each other, and we actively discourage commercial entities passing themselves off as individuals to post advertising material or links. This may also apply to people or organisations that frequently post propaganda or external links.
•Keep it relevant. We know some conversations can be wide-ranging, but if you post something unrelated to the original topic (“off-topic”) then it may be removed to keep the thread on track. This also applies to queries or comments about moderation, which should not be posted as comments.
•Be aware that you may be misunderstood, so try to be clear about what you are saying, and expect that people may understand your contribution differently than you intended. Remember that text can be misconstrued: tone of voice (sarcasm, humour and so on) doesn’t always come across when read by others.
•The platform is ours, but The Conversation belongs to everybody. We want this to be a welcoming space for intelligent discussion, and we expect participants to help us achieve this by notifying us of potential problems and helping each other to keep conversations inviting and appropriate. If you spot something problematic in community interaction areas, please report it to email@example.com. When we all take responsibility for maintaining an appropriate and constructive environment, the debate is improved and everyone benefits.”