Story by Scott Probst
Debate, or rather the get-tough bidding war, on the subject of radicals continues here in Australia. For some weeks now the idea that anyone from this country that goes to certain areas for any reason can be cut adrift from Australia has been out in the open.
There is a certain appeal in this. If you go to fight a war somewhere else (except in our army of course), you should just stay there and be damned. After some thought however there seem to be some problems with this approach.
First, not all of the Australians are fighting on the same side. In other words, some are on the ‘good’ side, say with the Peshmerga. Still others might not be fighting at all – they might be acting as medics, or they might be women going to be so-called ‘wives,’ whatever that might be. So we might be condemning all kinds of people to not ever returning to Australia, even misled and victimised young women and their families who have gone to retrieve them. It’s hard to see how this will decrease radicalisation: leaving people with no choices but bad ones rarely has positive result.
Now, even if all the people going over there were really fighting in the war, and in fact are basically wrong-headed in their approach, would we really want to cut them off from ever returning? What would happen if we did? What would happen if every country in the world did this?
It seems the most obvious result would be that there would be a large pool of young, disenfranchised, uncared for, trained killers. They would be mobile, have no state loyalties, be embittered and easily led, as they would not be in touch with any influences other than whatever pseudo-religious propaganda the current warlords wanted to feed them. And if none of them had a state to return to, where would they go? They would go anywhere there were aimed at, and cause trouble there.
And when they caused trouble, what would happen? We, or others, would have to send troops to stop them. The whole cycle would start again. I can’t see this doing anything except starting another, more serious, episode of war and destruction.
If they were in a proper country, they would be getting more balanced information, be subject to the rule of law, and we would be in a position to re-influence them away from whatever garbage their heads had been filled with.
I’ve been just this morning encouraged to see a political party, the Greens in this case, coming out with some thoughts along these lines. Logical thinking seems in short supply amongst the majors at the moment on most issues, and some considered debate is most welcome.
ngawangchogdrub said:
This just keeps getting worse. Legislation relating to citizenship states that you will be stripped of citizenship [if you are a dual national] if one:
“acts inconsistently with their allegiance to Australia”
What the hell does this mean? If some shock jock says you’re ‘unAustralian’? If you don’t like BBQs?
LikeLike
gerard oosterman said:
They, Abbott and cohorts, now wants an inquiry in the ABC on the Q&A ‘affaire’. As if that can weigh up against his public denunciations on wind turbines and having appointed a commissioner into renewables after sacking the commissioner for disabilities.
Jeez, what is Australia coming to?
LikeLike
ngawangchogdrub said:
And now the PM appears to have actually lost his grip on reality, showing off to the press with coloured maps of the ‘jihadi recruiting’ areas of Sydney and Melbourne. Besides the obvious issue of compromising the actions of the security agency concerned, is this not a power-drunk move from someone who feels he is untouchable?
LikeLike
Therese Trouserzoff said:
Yes, how bizarre was the map episode. Clearly everyone living west of Strathfield is a terrorist in waiting. What an arsehole !
LikeLike
ngawangchogdrub said:
Thanks all. As a backdrop we see the PM referring in Parliament to “the children of criminals” when talking about the children of a killed Australian jihadi being able to come home. Being children, presumably they didn’t decide to relocate to a war zone, so it’s hard to see anything rational in the language being used.
Also we see, in an xenophobic link, that the ALP might support emergency legislation to sidestep a legal challenge to offshore processing. The hate machines appear to be in full swing.
LikeLike
vivienne29 said:
Making sense again !
LikeLike
George Theodoridis said:
Good thinking, Scott.
Our disesteemed leader is slipping into insanity and stalinism (paranoia and brutality at its paradigmatic) faster by the minute. My brain seizes when I imagine what would have happened if he had the numbers in both Houses of Parliament!
And they want to remove the Senate!
If this is the mindset of all Catholics, then Zeus spare me this troublesome brute!
LikeLike
lindyp said:
Well said Scott-I like your way of thinking .
LikeLike