
Is it not amazing that certain people are deemed to be beyond being human and possess a quality that not even the purest of cherubic angels could possibly ever own? Not just most times, but twenty four hours seven days, and over their entire lives. There was Justice Einfeld being caught speeding and telling a porky that most of us are more than capable of and probably doing most of the time. Yet, he was jailed for being what we all are, fallible human beings. The fact of being a retired superior High Court Judge, a former President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission and a Unicef Ambassador for children did not stand in the way of his punishment. In fact, that was precisely why he was given such a harsh sentence.
There we are all cheerfully filling in our tax forms telling lies that will probably give us a nice little earner in refunds, hiding a few grand here and there in dodgy trusts or splitting income with our friendly stumpy Cattle dog ‘Bitem’. All very legit, as they say.
Good onya mate, Bob’s your uncle. But for a mere bagatelle of a porky, poor Marcus in jail, hopefully with enough wisdom in contemplating the irony of it all.
Lately there has been remarkable diligence on the part of a blood hounding mob of do-gooders sniffing out scents in the discarded underpants of ethics, never of just ordinary folks like us, but only of those in the public eye.
Some time ago, the minister for Defence, having enjoyed a paid trip to China, compliments of a friend, apologizing for his lapse of memory or simply having forgotten it all, was being pursued by batteries of video cameras raised and aimed for his face from journalists with the well practised sensitivities of belt sanders.
Where do the expectations come from that people in the limelight or of high position are somehow better or above the rest of us? There is the French President, divorcing his wife in full flight, taking a new one and being rewarded by a surge in popularity. At the G8 Summit Conference he was allegedly filmed drunk. Such panache! Are the French so much more sophisticated and tolerant and we in Australia so hypocritical? Could a prime minister have gotten away with the’ flair and nous’ what the French President Nicolas Sarkozy seems to have managed so far? Remember the uproar about young Kevin at the nightclub incident in the US? Where was our pride in our PM being one of us?
Is it also perhaps a fact that others elsewhere are more capable than us, of allowing even people in high places still to be human? The French President, after all, divorcing, taking another partner and sometimes getting pissed is what most of us intrinsically do as well. Why the hypocrisy here when it involves only people in the limelight?
Those that get caught with child porn on their computers are also invariably ‘normal’ as well. From ABC employees to judges and magistrates, police officers, priests and prosecutors, and even ‘stranger danger’ educators. They all line up, worldwide, being charged, with having downloaded and/or spreading child porn. Now, if ‘normal ‘people are all so feeble and weak to fall prey to doing bad things at times, why are we always pretending those things are being done by others? Is it not true that we are all capable by just a hair’s breadth of doing unacceptable things? We can’t say that people caught are all seemingly respectable pillars of society and absolutely ‘normal’ and condemning them, without also allowing and accepting that we are all capable of doing those bad things as well.
In the period of Queen Victoria, there were estimated to be over a hundred thousand child prostitutes in London alone. It is a fair bet, that those that abused children then were the judges, teachers, religious clergy, cabinet ministers, and regarded then as ‘normal’ as those now that are now caught with kiddie porn on their computers. Not that long ago, we stood by with terrible things being done to refugees, for years on end. The indefinite detention without trial of one of ours for many years, D.Hicks. The humiliation of Dr.Haneef and Cornelia Rau. Basic and blatant breaches of human rights. All evil things done under our noses and with the apparent approval of most of us ‘normal’ people, without as much as a single prosecution so far. Where were the bloodhounds then?
Next time we hear or read about bad things, small or large, it is more likely to be ’us’ rather than ‘them’. We are ‘normal’.
Well there ya go. A bit of research and it’s all as clear as mud; but G may well be more right than we care to admit. It does seem as though abuse of children in all categories of abuse is far more common than I for one would ever have thought.
I’m not sure what that means except that apparently we are far more likely to abuse physically than sexually but by far the most common abuse of children is emotional according to stats from just about every peak child psychological and psychiatric body here and globally.
We’re bad monkeys, there can be no doubt. Its saddening to read those stats, it really is. Makes you want to love your kids and grandkids just that bit more.
LikeLike
Judges and paedophiles, hmm, not much difference from my view.
LikeLike
I love those little piglets; I think those two little shy ones are girls and the big confident one on the right is a boy piglet, on the way to become a big bullying pig.
LikeLike
I feel a bit bad for having eaten a dish of roast pork for lunch today. Lovely crackling though.
LikeLike
Seriously. The overall impression I get from this article is that child porn is normal and making a fuss about it is unsophisticated. That’s not a good look. I hope you will clarify, gerard.
LikeLike
You take the impression that you want to take on it Voice. The article takes on more than child porn.
LikeLike
That’s not the impression I want to take. It’s a topic where a bit of care wouldn’t go amiss though.
LikeLike
Sorry to veer off the the topic some what, but I just noticed amongst the Search Engine Terms that someone has a Dukati 350 Desmo for sale. Something for you motorbike loving male piglets ?!
Another person is looking for ‘pig and whistle fancy dress bowral’, I might be able to help her/him.
One does come across some funny ones…
LikeLike
Do you have a URL for the Duke 350, H ?
LikeLike
Are you interested, Emm? Sorry no URL, I found it under the Search Engine Terms. I find many of them very amusing. You must enjoy the spam mail pigs arms receives.
LikeLike
Another thought-provoking Gezzarticle. A few comments from me.
I think the Marcus Einfeld rap is sad, but understandable on the grounds that it shows a profound lack of judgement – not a good look in one whose job IS to judge. He ratted on his own tribe – the judiciary. And if he had fessed up and paid the trivial fine, none of the remaining shit would have fallen on his head. Poor judgement.
As for another person having a lapse of judgement into seeking out, viewing or holding child porn, I don’t see this as a kind of lapse of judgement. I see it as crossing the line into abominable and unacceptable behaviour. I also see it as a sickness as well as a crime.
But there can be extenuating circumstances. Someone else could use a shared PC for this criminal activity and the owner of the PC could be blamed if the crime is detected. It is also possible to stumble upon a child porn site through pursuing an unhappily accidental search link. The distinguishing difference between an accidental child porn viewer and a hard core sicko is usually stark. The former might only have a browsing history of a link or two. The latter will usually have literally thousands of images.
I have a friend who works with child protection people and she told the story of a policeman who worked in child protection for several years and had become desensitised to the horror. Later on he crossed the line. He was caught in his own force’s sting with a home computer with thousands of horrendous images. His colleagues were torn between his betrayal of their cause and their team – and pity for how far he’d sunk. He was given extensive psychological counselling and quietly “retired”.
For me, Gez, the issue is that “normal” people innately understand the sickness and the criminality of child porn and seek not revenge, but appropriate punishment and treatment. I don’t believe that it’s either a forgivable or a forgettable crime. The recidivism rates are dreadful – maybe 80%+.
LikeLike
I think you’ve said it all.
Einfeld just kept going, and going, with such a thin tissue of lies that the popular press blew their collective noses on it, and tossed it aside.
Likewise with the kiddie porn. An older couple I know were accused of kiddie fiddling by their, now adult, drug addled daughter, who saw some photos of herself in the bath as a baby. House searched, interviews by detectives, etc. Thankfully exonerated, but after an exhaustive process.
Interestingly, where I work, things like google Images, including maps, are blocked. this is because someone was caught with 1000s of images on his work computer, which he’d smuggled in on a USB drive. It seems we are all terrified of pedophiles, but society has had them since the dawn of time.
LikeLike
I think our visceral reaction to the thought of someone harming our children or indeed any child is something that has evolved in us, it’s fundamental to our being as social apes. The children are the expression of our will to survive and pass on our genetic and socio-cultural heritage.
But you’re right sexually harming or exploiting children has a special place, a special twist of hatred to it, and it may be that some small part of that is because we see that, as G points out, for some it’s just a small step further on from loving children for their innocence and bright potential, and that there but for the grace of god etc.
That such acts are actually very rare statistically and the fear of falling into the darkness is entirely unfounded in the overwhelming majority of people doesn’t make us any the less fearful, and all the science pointing to a particular pathological basis for this aberrant behaviour doesn’t make us any the more forgiving.
That said, there is a significant difference between fiddling your tax and fiddling “Uncle Ernie” style though G. A huge difference between telling lies and harming children.
LikeLike
I hope that comparing tax fiddling Uncle Bernie was not being compared with the ‘ kiddie fiddling Uncle Ernie.
My statement was more about the ‘apparent normalness’ of those charged with child sex offences. Of course they are not normal.
It just happens they are indistinguishable from your local handshaking vicar or Judge, swim coach etc. Many seem to conform and appear to be part of a normal society as you and I.
I suppose what threw me was the ABC’s Collectors compare Muirhead ‘allegedly’ found with child porn on his computer.
So ordinary and wholesome looking boy with cheeks like Tasmanian apples.
The statistics on child sexual abuse are not all that rare either. In fact, sexual abuse of minors is horrendously high.
LikeLike
No. No, I wasn’t in any way seeking to trivialise or disparage your post. Yes we’re all liars and cheats, but thankfully few of us are paedolphiles.
But what are the stat’s G? Do you have a source there? I must admit I was talking through my hat when I said, based entirely in an unsupported assumption, that the occurrence of these things is statistically infrequent.
I agree of course that these people look “normal”, otherwise we’d be running them outta town as soon as we clocked them.
LikeLike
There are dozens of pages on Google that purport to be statistics on Child abuse. Here is part of one of them.
The statistics are shocking
1 in 4 girls is sexually abused before the age of 18. (96)
1 in 6 boys is sexually abused before the age of 18. (96)
1 in 5 children are solicited sexually while on the internet. (30, 87)
Nearly 70% of all reported sexual assaults (including assaults on adults) occur to children ages 17 and under. (76)
An estimated 39 million survivors of childhood sexual abuse exist in America today. (1)
Even within the walls of their own homes, children are at risk for sexual abuse
30-40% of victims are abused by a family member. (2, 44, 76)
Another 50% are abused by someone outside of the family whom they know and trust.
Approximately 40% are abused by older or larger children whom they know. (1, 44)
Therefore, only 10% are abused by strangers.
Sexual abuse can occur at all ages, probably younger than you think
The median age for reported abuse is 9 years old. (64)
More than 20% of children are sexually abused before the age of 8. (76)
Nearly 50% of all victims of forcible sodomy, sexual assault with an object, and forcible fondling are children under 12. (74, 76)
LikeLike
Those statistics are complete nonsense. They boost the stats by redefining ‘sexual abuse’.
LikeLike
Here are our own Australian Government statistics.
Substantiations are categorised into one of four maltreatment types: physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect. Table 3 shows the breakdown of substantiations for the four different types of maltreatment in Australian states and territories. In New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory emotional abuse was the most commonly substantiated maltreatment type. In Western Australia, and the Northern Territory neglect was the most commonly substantiated maltreatment type.
Table 3. Primary substantiated maltreatment types in Australian states and territories in 2008-09
NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT Australia
Emotional abuse 13,266 2,935 2,756 272 1,267 565 388 213 21,662
Neglect 10,381 518 2,174 631 802 388 341 344 15,229
Physical abuse 6,412 2,438 1,860 311 249 167 134 218 11,789
Sexual abuse 4,019 453 525 309 101 68 33 83 5,591
Total 34,078 6,344 7,315 1,523 2,419 1,188 896 858 54,621
Source: AIHW (2010, p. 52)
LikeLike
I is good. I don’t lie, cheat or covet men belonging to other women.
OK, OK, sometimes I tell a WHITE lie when I want to boost your already too big male egos…
LikeLike
Mrs M does the same thing.
No, you’re not overweight, darling.
No, your hair isn’t thinning.
Grey hair is really, really distinguished!
LikeLike