By Algernon
I thought about replying to either Asty’s or Atomou’s blog but found that my response was a bit too long for that.
Looks like it might be time for someone to feed themselves to the lions. Unlike most here I’m a god botherer. I posted as such on some of the earlier blogs at UL, some here may recall some of those earlier discussions. I then decided to avoid any blogs that were of a religious or atheist bent because they seemed to be full of nutters. Many of those purporting to be atheists seemed to be to me to be overwhelmingly lapsed catholics. Similarly those claiming to be christians by and large loony tune fundamentalists or weird Pentecostals. I could see little point engaging in debate. On top of that the debate I found to be particularly vicious.
I can tell you that I was an elder for a few years in the church I was attending at the time. Regularly people would come asking for money for food, petrol and other things. We would provide them with the food or petrol etc. On one occasion we had a couple and a baby turn up. They were from northern NSW visiting a family member on remand at Silverwater prison and had arrived by bus. They have virtually no money and a bus ticket home. They arrived at the prison to find that the date for visiting had been changed from what they had been advised, in writing I might add. No one would help them. One non christian organization allegedly told them to get lost. We found accommodation for them at a local motel and provided them breakfast, organized for food for the baby, had their bus ticket changed to travel on the following day. What we didn’t do was shove a Bible in front of them or prostletyse. The same for any of the others who would come asking for help.
Now the best advertisement for atheism for me are religious schools. Should a child profess a faith at one of these schools then it will almost universally be junked by the time they go on schoolies or within the first year after school. Indoctrination just doesn’t work. What does seem to amaze me is the amount of lapsed catholics who send the kids to catholic schools then bleat about them. Many have been abused in one form or another then send their own to them! Of all the ministers I know only two of their children were sent to private religious schools (they get mates rates, something like a 50 to 70% discount). They send them to state schools because they more closely reflect the society they will encounter. Religious schools appear to me to be an artificial construct of society.
Would I send any of my children a religious school or private school? Absolutely not. Never a catholic school. Apart from the fact I think the catholic church makes it up as they go along and any relationship to the new testament is purely coincidental. Private schools are just that private and should not receive funding from the public purse. The fact that they have exploded can be put down to Howard treating them like quasi public schools. I’m fortunate that I live in an area where the public schools are very good and outperform the local private schools where frankly private schools standard of education is substandard with the exception of one.
Do I think chaplains should be in public schools? No I don’t. There needs to be more councilors in schools rather than the one that might have three or four schools to look after. There is an overwhelming need for them. What I’d like to also see is parents parenting their children rather than children dragging themselves up. Having teenage kids of my own, I’ve become aware how some of these kids are just left to their own devices. Their parents have no idea where they are or what they’re up to some no older than 12 or 13. Or the 14 year old whose mother is about 30 and separated from the father. Mum relies on handouts from places like the salvation army. When at Dad’s she’s the one doing the cooking, the shopping, the washing. On the occasions she’d stay at our place and sit down for a meal she’d wonder what the vegetables were. In the end our youngest had to break with this girl – she was a source of our youngest one’s depression. Nowadays to protect herself the relationship is on our youngster’s terms.
Teachers aren’t social workers and they need to concentrate on being teachers. Councilors are in a better position to help kids than chaplains – or anyone really who more likely has had a few months of mickey mouse training and is really only in a position to give basic support. Heck, through dealing with my daughter and the training we’ve got, I’ve probably got more psychological training than most of them. I wouldn’t attempt to do anything more than refer people to people who can actually help. Nor should these “councilors”.
I’m not a Christian who does things to be good or do certain works to enable me to tick certain boxes. Nor do I want to be tagged with clowns giving dates for the second coming as last Sunday, perhaps they could read Matthew 24 on that. It gave those in the Algernon household a good laugh with the youngest out looking for zombies. I’m not a catholic, never have been and never will. Nor do I have much time for places like Hillsong.
Parables like the good Samaritan or casting the first stone. I find them more relevant.

Algernon, some of the very best people I know are believers and therefore I find this almost militant atheism distasteful; my mum was a believer and they dont make good people like her anymore.
Sometimes I think it’s almost fashionable to be an atheist, a bit like being a feminist.
LikeLike
I think you’re right Helvi, I think there are many out there who call themselves atheist without knowing what being an athiest is. I could say the same of many who call themselves christians. Regardless of what we think we are we all have talents and skills. It’s how we express or use them.
LikeLike
I’m sorry you find ‘such almost militant’ atheism distasteful, Helvi, though I’m surprised to have to remind you that it doesn’t actually become ‘militant’ until atheists take up arms in the name of atheism as a cause (which it is not) and start to shoot people… we devalue words when we use them merely for effect.
My mum too was a devout believer; she used to be a devout believer in the catholic church but now even she sees through that organization and thinks that churches may need gods, but if there is a god, he/she/it does not necessarily need the church… she’s still a devout believer.
I’m well aware that there are good people among believers, even among the clergy… in ALL religions… and surprise, surprise, there are good people among atheists too. That I choose to defend the rights of atheists is not necessarily an attack on such people, as I think Algernon understands…
When I first started posting on the Drum I used to call myself an agnostic, but that was largely a politeness, out of ‘respect’ for the beliefs of those with whom I was engaged in discussion… now the debate and the prejudices of some of the believers I’ve engaged with have polarized my thinking on the subject; I must confess I’m less tolerant of some of the rubbish they spout than I used to be and much more ready to call myself an atheist. The more moderate and thoughtful believers like Elijah Thomas, for example, appear to have taken a back seat and now allow the more strident voices of the fundamentalists come to the fore…
This is what really worries me about religions in general, Helvi, the more moderate believers are so easily left to the ‘leadership’ of the ignorant and fundamentalist; and these often do become truly militant, though I realize their fundamentalist interpretations even of their own holy books are often highly questionable even by the standards of their own religion; they take pride in their own ignorance and thrive by bullying quieter voices into submission and acceptance of their agenda, much the same way the nazi movement throve in Germany during the 1930’s…. simply because they bullied everyone into silence and submission. This kind of thing has happened over and over again during the history of the christian religion and its Judaic origins… they never really seem to learn… Today it’s fashionable to be a peaceful christian… tomorrow it may be the sword- and gun-wielding ones who get to run the roost again, just as the christian fundamentalist neo-cons did when they urged the USA to go to war in Iraq against the muslim infidel…
And it is for this reason that I feel compelled to speak out against it when I find that the rights of atheists, firstly to BE atheists, and secondly, to raise their kids as atheists, is so unrecognized by believers that proselytizers, who can’t make converts any other way, are given such free access to them even against their parents’ wishes; and that properly trained and qualified counselors are eschewed in favor of well-meaning amateur ‘chaplains’ simply because they have a religious bent, who are then apparently allowed to proselytize even in spite of the guidelines specific injunction to the contrary. This is really a matter of self-defense: it is about the right of the individual to choose who they are and who they want their children to be.
Now, I’ve never denied or refused the right of christian parents to bring their kids up as christians… all I’m asking for is recognition of the same right for atheists. There are plenty of places where christians can go if they want their schools to support their religion… but if you take away the secular nature of state schools where else can atheists send their kids to get a secular education? When I asked ‘do atheists have no rights at all’ I was not exaggerating Helvi, because it seems like christians – or at least some of the more stridently vocal ones – seem to think that atheists do not even have the right to BE atheists; it is therefore very much a matter of survival. You trivialize this by suggesting that atheism is simply a matter of ‘fashion’; the latter is more true of religions… For atheists it’s about the right to exist!
Is that really so much to ask for? Or should we go back to burning witches and heretics?
🙂
LikeLike
Asty, I’m a tolerant person, and I’m happy for people to be atheists, believers of any religion. I just don’t like the intolerance that some atheists show towards believers, and I don’t see you as an intolerant person. 🙂
Because I was brought up in a Lutheran ‘style’ of religion, the believing or not believing was left up to me. We still have religious instruction in schools in Finland, but on the whole the Finns are not known for their churchgoing; we learn about Hindu, Buddhism and Islam and I can’t see anything wrong with that. I suppose we learn to be tolerant, which is good.
When I read those ‘godless’ blogs on the Drum, I see there are plenty of atheists who hardly know what the word means. They just jumping in and shouting about being ‘athiests’,( can’t even spell ). They are a little bit like the young girls who call themselves feminists because they taking part in some silly Slutwalk and want to reclaim the word ‘slut’. 🙂
LikeLike
Thank you Helvi… You are indeed, the most tolerant of people; I do see your point, and I’m glad we both agree on the value of tolerance. I see nothing wrong with kids learning about all the major world religions, but definitely something wrong with learning about only one… or even the incredibly simplistic notion that that there is only ONE truth… or that people who don’t believe in religion must be inherently evil…
I don’t always read all the comments on any given blog (though sometimes I do…) and maybe I’ve missed the kind of ‘athiest’ you describe, though I don’t doubt they exist. I do however think I’ve seen similar ‘wannabees’ (I think is the correct current idiom) among the believers. Many of them really don’t seem to know much at all about the religions they profess to believe in… but isn’t this just kids ‘trying on’ identities in their own personal search for who they want to be? They may be a little tiresome, but I suppose most of them will grow out of it eventually… or into something else!
🙂
LikeLike
The Drum IS polarising, asty, and I don’t think it’s representative, inasmuch as it clusters around the poles of any issue. It seems to harden people’s views and reinforce their prejudices.
LikeLike
Yes, I think you’re quite right, Voice, it’s very hard to write a constructive contribution to almost any of the debates they seem to keep running ad nauseum these days; frankly, it scares me! If the only purpose that debate serves is to multiply and broaden divisions and cleavages as it does, it seems we are inevitably going to be left in a world where atomised individuals are manipulated en masse… in fact it already seems that the world is this way to me… I think I’m about as ‘atomised’ as I can get, unless I develop schizophrenia! (And I have to tell you that sometimes that’s a very tempting thought!)
🙂
LikeLike
Asty, send me an EMail. I’ve misplaced your address. Need a quick return. Cheers, Mike
LikeLike
Algae, it’s always good to hear from you, and even better to see a little genuine discussion in the front bar…
Firstly let me say that I would most certainly not describe you as a ‘god-botherer’; that particular label is reserved for the proselytisers who come round knocking on your door bothering you with their ‘god’, trying to manipulate you into conversion using the tired old carrot and stick method… (and also for pricks like gigaboomer!)
You have always been far more reasonable; if you call yourself a christian, I think you are probably one of the few who actually seem to understand what Jesus was really all about; most of those who wear the label ‘christian’ really don’t, you know…
Secondly, however, I must object to the term ‘lapsed catholic’:
This term implies that at some stage or other one will revert to one’s early catholic training and that one is somehow currently ‘in denial’ of one’s own true feelings; let me assure you that I’m very much an EX-catholic and with a very heavy emphasis on the ‘ex’… I have not the slightest intention of ever ‘returning to the fold’; I’m no sheep! I’ve been a wanderer all my life and the travels of Odysseus mean far more to me than the crucifixion of some poor sod two thousand years ago, which was then mythologised as a human-sacrifice-cum-scapegoat-ritual by Saul of Tarsus…
You see, I had no choice but to become a catholic and was indoctrinated ‘as soon as I was warm’ (to quote Monty Python). By the time I was nine years old I discovered that the church was not the wonderful and saintly organisation it pretends to be and that started me looking for meaning to my existence elsewhere; initially in other christian organisations (I used to play solo euphonium in a salvation army young people’s brass band…) and then further afield. As a young adult I explored the classics and also other contemporary world religions, though always as something more of an observer than a believer (it seems to me looking back that I was a natural-born anthropologist).
Having also studied the nature of religion from an anthropological perspective I can say that there are good and bad not only in all races, but in all religions; even the followers of Jim Jones were more ‘deluded’ than bad; as was Mr Jones himself…
But more importantly, the same set of values seems to me to be prescribed by all the major world religions: honor your parents and treat people with respect; don’t steal or kill; don’t rape or covet your neighbours ass (or even his wife’s!); don’t tell lies or go spreading malicious gossip; be kind to women and children, widows and orphans… So even though you personally identify yourself as ‘christian’, because that is undoubtedly where you learned your own appreciation for these values, since these values are ultimately not ‘christian’ or even ‘religious’ values, but rather, ‘human’ values, I’d say you were at least one of those christians who understand the value of ‘becoming human’, which also is how I like to describe those who actually practise the values they preach without any need to give them any ‘divine’ referent… ‘atheists’ in other words. No, I’m not trying to say you’re an atheist at heart; just a christian who understands the value of humanism… there used to be quite a lot of them, even in the middle ages: Thomas More and Thomas Wolsey, to name but two… though it’s arguable which of this pair was the truer ‘humanist’.
Finally, I must thank you for a well-considered and thoughtful response on the issue of religious schools, or more particularly the proselytising of religion in state schools; as you say, religious schools are a wonderful advertisement for atheism… perhaps I’d even still be a believer had it not been for some of the Dickensian institutions I had to suffer in my formative years… Nah… Can’t see it!
Anyway, ‘bye for now, Algernon, my old friend; and as the wonderful Irish comedian, Dave Allen, used to say, “May your god go with you!”
🙂
LikeLike
Asty, I’m very pleased to share the company of all the Pig’s Patrons – who are happy to present such a civilised exchange. Good on you.
LikeLike
Thank you Emmjay. It’s a privilege to be in such truly civilized company.
Would you believe that a certain Tim Dunlop has just published an article very similar to mine and iterating the same themes I’ve been posting during the last week or so in the ‘comments’ section…
He mentions the ‘rights of atheists’, of which I believe I was the first to speak on that blog and even mentions Dave Allen, though his article is differently worded and contains what I can only presume are personal anecdotes; franky, I think mine was better written!
I have a strange feeling it could be worse than useless for me to bother contributing anything further to that other blog… except where it may serve some purpose to advertise my own. Other than that it would appear my contributions only serve to benefit other writers more than myself… No wonder I have a hard time making ends meet!
I also emailed ‘New Matilda’ and offered them the same article, but it may well have been seen as ‘cold’ by them… Haven’t heard back from them yet either… (but then, I also had the nerve to ask about ‘the possibility of remuneration’…)
😐
LikeLike
Struth – quoting Dave Allen (who’s been dead for how long ?) is a heck of a co-incidence. I wonder how many other PA patron’s ideas are appropriated by scoundrels.
It’s nice to be setting the Drum agenda by stealth though – but not so nice when the power bills come in.
As far as Matilda goes, they’ve had a “pause” in their publishing when the cash ran out. They are forever seeking donations – much like community radio and your not unreasonable inquiry about remuneration might have reminded them of the scary “broke” days. Our blogsphere is a problematic place as far as getting paid is concerned. While I subscribe to Crikey, I hardly ever read more than one or two articles each issue – except the brilliant cartoons of First Dog on the Moon. New Matilda has been described in the past as “worthy, but a bit bland”. So people maybe don’t feel compelled to put their cash on the bar.
While I think about it, one of the plusses of First Dog – is the company – quite like the PA patrons – who are in kind, also funny, wise and very entertaining.
I wish you luck in your pursuit of a few bob from writing. It’s a reasonable aspiration, but elusive for me. I had 17 articles published at Unleashed and the ABC Health site when I finally gave up – and earned not a cent. Well, not true, the health site people gave me 2 X $25 gift vouchers from the ABC shop – which, when I checked, had gone past their expiry date. I asked them about this and they said “send them back and we’ll replace them” – but by then, I’d mislaid the buggers. Such is life.
LikeLike
Asty I’ll use the term EX in future. And given that you’ve quoted Monty, I know you’ll enjoy this little offering.
LikeLike
Many thanks Algae! I knew you were one of the good ‘uns… You can usually tell by the presence of a strong sense of humor and a clear recognition of life’s absurdities.
‘Every Sperm is Sacred’ is one of my favorites from Monty Python, and the next song to be included in my repertoire as soon as I can find a lyric sheet and the chords…
🙂
LikeLike
I have said once before that the handful of people I respect the most are all clergy, who have done a tremendous amount for other people, are experienced, genuine, and do not proselytise at the drop of the hat. They typically deal with people at times of great loss and/or hardship; serious illness or death. They do a totally brilliant job counselling.
Only one of them has children, and they both went to the private school where he was the headmaster; and thrived there, surprisingly enough.
I always respect people’s religion when it is genuine, except of course for total nutters of whom I must say I have only read, and never met.
LikeLike
And many suffer horribly for it. For many though their councilling can only go so far before they should pass some onto those more qualified and many do. Its an incredibly tough gig.
LikeLike
I can only comment on the people of whom I am thinking. You are thinking of other people and are no doubt correct about them.
Of some of the ‘more qualified’ I’ve met, I spit on them. Qualifications are never are substitute for genuine caring about people and sound instincts.
LikeLike
Candid and appreciated Algy.
My wife teaches in a private school; my daughter teaches in a public school, as my wife did in the past. None of us believe that god exists.
I understand how it started and has been passed down. Therefore I do not decry people private belief. I only resent any attempts to give religion any credence, once I have made it obvious that I am offended by the idea of an imaginary, invisible god. Not the first time, that’s justifiable. But when I make it obvious that I have a different point of view.
I suppose that is myopic of me–and I should let people try and prove to me that god exists. But I have found that after listening over , say, a thousand times, and no one has been able to prove it to me–it has made me grumpy.
I worship The Everly Brothers.
LikeLike
Doesn’t sound at all like you’re a god botherer, algy.
I care not what people believe. I care only that they don’t “bother”, that they don’t proselytise and you have abjured the practice -and the Mics! Well done, mate!
LikeLike
Thanks, Algernon. I must confess that my mother is one of those born again god-botherers who does scripture at schools, in the hope that she can convert some little waif to ‘god’s way’. She has no formal training but feels that working as a member of the ancillary staff in schools is sufficient. She’s always dropping hints about how some memeber of the congregation is praising Jesus because a recalcitrant family member came to church.
I don’t mind churches, nice ones. I have attended the midnight Christmas eve service at the Anglican Cathedral, and quite enjoyed it. By the same token, I’m looking forward to the new Mosque opening near our place. The local Muslims are quite community minded, and welcome us non-believers. Much like your lot!!
Keep up the good work, mate.
LikeLike
Thank you for the reply. Algy.
I like a good parable too. When Tim the Cabin Boy had to do his religious education assignment, at his Catholic High School (not being catholics or practicing any religious faith), we had to help him a fair bit. The parable of the good Samaritan is really interesting – it’s multi-layered and the background – Jesus answering the questions of some smart-arsed law student “who is my neighbour” is as enlightening as the main event by the road side.
Tim first went to a local state high school for half a year. We pulled him out when he was attacked in the gym change room and the matter of another boy’s assault was taken over by the police and DoCS.
The catholics interviewed us within 48 hours and offered Tim a place (despite his protestations). The state school shouted anarchy and the tyke students in contrast showed clear and consistent discipline and mutual respect.
I sent both the Emmlets to not one, but two private faith-based schools – not because of the religious instruction, but because they had an awesome track record in the HSC. The local state high school styled itself as a “sports” high school – but seemed to post few successes at sport and even fewer at academic pursuits. We tracked their results for five years in the local press and in the annual Herald HSC results lists.
All three schools did not care much whether we had a faith – so long as we paid the fees and were not outwardly hostile to their Christian values – with which, we sympathised anyway.
It DID cost us a lot of money – and the schools did receive funds from the public purse. And I am happy with some of my taxes going there. Far better there than for a school who could not protect our children from harm, or give them a good chance at a quality HSC. Far better than spending billions each year on the military.
At the end of the day, I guess people make choices for their kids’ education by many criteria, not the least of them an ability to pay. Doing that kept us fairly close to the wolf, but I’m glad we did. It’s paid off handsomely in their Uni entrances and for their results so far – the elder – in going on to study medicine as a second degree. They did / are doing the hard work; we merely did our best to remove barriers and grease the slipway.
LikeLike
Ah, sport and the public high school. From my experience most kids think that public high school sport is a joke and that their weekend sport is more important. Eldest Algenonina tried for the netball team a few years back, they only play in year 9 where she is at school, but didn’t make it, yet someone from her weekend team did. Ironically the girl couldn’t throw or catch. The younger tried this year, in Primary school she just missed out in representing Sydney North at the State Netball carnival. She doesn’t do PDHPE which appeared to be a prerequisite. Suprisingly she didn’t get in. This time around though they picked someone as a shooter who cannot shoot. Sport is the only downside I can find at their school. They are very protective of their senior cohort (and their juniors) and work very hard with them, their HSC results are consistantly good, thats after losing some to selective high schools or private schools. They are proactive regarding bullying for example and are compassionate with the youngest in her recent struggles.
My distain for private schools came from growing up in Hornsby and the way the that those “privileged (or so they thought)” kids carried on, on the North Shore. If we lived somewhere different to where we do, we may think differently about the local private schools in those areas. I agree with you about the right to choose and the military.
The best sermon I’ve heard in the last 10 years was on who is my neighbour where the minister used a modern day context and put “important” people into various roles and the Samaritan were muslims in a hotted up hoonmobile, very confronting.
LikeLike
Algy, this might surprise other patrons de la maison de porc, but the kids sport thing is an important part for us too. Emmlets both played hockey and T-ball > baseball from an early age for local clubs. Emmlet 1 played both sports at NSW independent schools level – but not because the school was any good at sport. They were really hopeless – pushing inclusion (which is fine by me) over also recognising excellence (which is not OK by me). Emmlet 2 had the best arm in the school from pitching for the local baseball team. Emmlet 2 used to assist the PE teacher – teaching other students – but the PE teacher failed to back Emmlet 2 for inclusion into the independent school state team. Another teacher noticed this and put Emmlet 2 into the state cricket team. Emmlet 2 had never played cricket but turned out to be a good quickish bowler (for Hung, Emmlet 2 tended to hit across the flight of the ball – all those years of baseball).
Anyway, the Emmlets changed school for their senior years and Emmlet 2 has been coaching hockey and softball at the new school for the last two years – earning a few dollars to help with uni. Pleased to see that they both still play a bit of sport, post high school – which is unusual these days.
LikeLike
I can see both the Algernoninas playing netball post high school. The oldest has started playing seniors this year even though she’s in year 11. The team is year 11 and 12’s and is in their second season. Shes not a sporting child but loves her netball.
The youngest loves the sport, plays and umpires and intendes to pursue the umpiring to a higher level. She’s been in the same team for three years and plays division 1. I can see this team playing on into adulthood.
Both teams play in the right spirit and have a lot of fun, which for mine is the whole reason for playing sport. I just dislike the cronyism that seems to follow sport and they way it affects selections of certain teams.
The youngest was a gun swimmer, could have swam for the country but chucked it in due to the attitudes of others.
LikeLike
Algernon, your reasons for disliking some sports seem remarkably similar to my reasons for disliking some religions…
🙂
LikeLike
I don’t dislike sports per se, in fact I think sport is a valuable part of a childs upbringing should they be that way inclined. Having been a coach, manager and committee member at a cricket club and now a manager and committee member at a netball club, I can only encourage kids to get involved go out and have fun at what ever level they are at.
What I dislike is the attitude of many and the carry on when seeing their young charges playing. Many think that they’re playing for sheep stations of think its OK toabuse the umpire/referees who are often only kids.
The youngest saw swimming as being about friendship and may still be had it not be anality of many of the parents.
LikeLike
I feel much the same way about sport too, Algae… You know, it’s really quite a fruitful metaphor, sport and religion, because, of course, once upon a time, all sport WAS religion… AND a preparation for war…
And it seems to me that, in some cases, it still is, even today…
😉
LikeLike
Mostly when we take on the Brits in any sport – and the Kiwis and South Africa in Rugby 🙂
LikeLike
Christ! A sensible theist! What a rare specimen! Well done Algy!
LikeLike
A well balanced view, good on you Algy.
LikeLike
Oh, I think that Father O’Way wants a say and has told me that a draft will be available soon
LikeLike
Oh dear ! 🙂
LikeLike