Tags
Image and Story by Lehan Winifred Ramsay
I can tell you where I was on 9/11, 2001. I was in front of the television. Most people were, I think. This 9/11 I made a special effort to stay away from the television. When is television going to learn from the other media, as we have, that its grip on our minds and hearts is no longer a given?
It was a big thing, it’s true. A lot of people died, and it was all captured on film. It’s not like a hundred years ago, when something like that happening would have filled columns on the front page of the newspaper, a day or two after it’s happening. And then ten years later, a mention of the memorial service, crowds, rousing speeches. Yes, a lot of things happened over this ten years. Nothing that looked as alluring on television though.
Photogenic, is what they call it. Somehow the person or non-person looks even better on film than they do in real life. We surely can’t say that our overwhelming attention on this scene, on this story, is just our obsession with ourselves, with our small part of the world.
No, there is something alluring about this story.
A lot of it looks like a movie. A lot like the kind of special effects that come out of America. And it is a bit ironic, because it’s very rare that such effects come out of a real life drama. Real life dramas are usually a bit more prosaic. Like – too much smoke, or too far in the distance to be able to get any detail. Had the day been cloudy, for example, much of the startling sharpness of the documentation would have been lost.
Then there is poignancy to the fact that the missiles had voices. The bullets huge airplanes filled with ordinary people going about their lives. With mobile phones. The buildings filled with people filling in the details of what happened. It’s no wonder that the names of the people who died have been put down in so many dimensions, when the dimension of Who was Where When with Who was added. Because we know.
And then – the missiles were us. Turning our planes on ourselves. Like taking the hand of a child and making him hit himself. A double insult. I say us because it was both America’s tragedy, only America’s – but somehow it also was not someone else’s tragedy. It was our tragedy.
How? How was it our tragedy? Perhaps it was simply because we were saturated with it.
We watched it, and watched it, for months, and now when we look at the tenth anniversary of it, what we are seeing and reliving are those months of our lives when that is what we did. We are commemorating the experience of seeing it on television.
Perhaps it was a moment – the moment, of a new kind of connection for us. One where the smallest and largest grids were in place, the tiniest personal gesture with the hugest intention, where it all came together to give us the most detailed and massive depiction of damage that we had ever seen. Perhaps the perpetrators would be embarrassed to realize that they gave us the Greatest Show on Earth, and that it was from America. And perhaps it was ironic that television had been “internationalized” by the wars of Kuwait and Iraq. Access to cable television, CNN, and satellite had been in part pushed along by those wars. So too perhaps was our tolerance to endless depictions of damage.
We all remember 9/11 because we were there. We were in our living rooms, our offices, in front of screens, there. Ten years on we can still remember it clearly as we place ourselves back in front of screens, there. How could we forget the day our television opened up and spat out such a vision to us. Like the first real 3D movie, not an imagined space but a collective one; our first truly Sensurround experience.
As for the rest of us, those who were not America, perhaps we had never before realized how big America was. And it was huge. Far bigger than the biggest flat-screen. Far bigger than the biggest network. It was everywhere. It was in every lounge room, in the corner of every restaurant, in a window of every village. I don’t believe that there was any place that did not know America in those days, in those early 2001 days. Perhaps we will never again know an America as big as that. Myself, I saw America in a foreign land, and I saw it whilst waving goodbye my holiday plans in the days after, not knowing how far the dust of this America would be traveling.
Do you remember? How America was everywhere? Do you remember, that we held our breath, wondering what America was going to do, wondering if we should look away, seeing the handprint of America’s own hand upon its cheek? Do you remember how you tried to go about your business but just couldn’t? Had to have another look, and another, and another? And how kind the television was, not scolding you for that, but just nicely replaying it again, just one more time, just one more time. It’s really no wonder we feel so nostalgic about it, those were generous days. These days we must sit through many more interviews in between replays. When they come they seem too short to give us that breathless feeling. Perhaps at some time in the future that will be considered voyeurism, we will no longer be free to gaze. Those of us who were there, those of us will never forget the indulgence of those early days.
It has been ten years. The America has had its revenge, ten years of it, and we have watched some of it, most of the time. I wonder if we have been satisfied. I wonder how things have gone.

Lehan, I read your article earlier on this arvo, but I’m still thinking about how to respond to it… so until such time as I’ve thunk up an adequate response, I’ll just say:
“Yo!”
😉
LikeLike
asty, just say what you think or feel, there is no censorship here, one has to be so careful on that silly Drum. (I commented on your excellent post on the music blog.)
LikeLike
To be honest, Helvi, it’s not that I’m worried about censorhip… I’m really just not sure how I feel… mostly confusion, I think, whenever I think back to the events of that day; hence my reluctance to speak… I still feel somewhat traumatised, perhaps by witnessing such events on ‘live’ television…
But I think Lehan’s right inasmuch as her article suggests that the USA was everywhere; and that’s probably what caused the problem in the first place; they USA’s wanting to be everywhere! And wanting to own everything…
🙂
LikeLike
America, wishing to be at the centre of the world, to know everything and be able to incorporate everything…..had set up these networks of information. To make sure that everyone heard what they wanted them to hear, that they heard what everyone was saying…..And when this thing happened those networks were in place, for different reasons, and in reverse. But they worked in reverse anyway. So American’s great Slap went out, the networks proved their great competence to give us, all of us, the picture.
LikeLike
10 years before 9/11, I was working in Jakarta. It was the time of the first gulf war. Every lunchtime we’d go down to watch the war scores on CNN and NBC at the “Top Gun” in Blok M. If you watched the Indonesian TV the war wasn’t even mentioned nor in the newspapers. Even in Australia the coverage was different I understand. CNN contradicted NBC regularly which shouldn’t have suprised as CNN was there with the troops.
LikeLike
Strange, Algae; here in SA, I felt like I couldn’t get away from ‘reportage’ from ’embedded’ journalists covering the first Gulf war… courtesy CNN, whom I’d never heard of before then…
🙂
LikeLike
Well I was in Indonesia at the time so I’m unsure what or how the war was reported. There CNN appeared to contradict NBC and the other main US networks. As for the locals there though what war?
LikeLike
…how the war was reported in Australia.
LikeLike
Talking about Chomsky: From Wiki.
The Chomskyan approach towards syntax, often termed generative grammar, studies grammar as a body of knowledge possessed by language users. Since the 1960s, Chomsky has maintained that much of this knowledge is innate, implying that children need only learn certain parochial features of their native languages.[34] The innate body of linguistic knowledge is often termed universal grammar. From Chomsky’s perspective, the strongest evidence for the existence of Universal Grammar is simply the fact that children successfully acquire their native languages in so little time. Furthermore, he argues that there is an enormous gap between the linguistic stimuli to which children are exposed and the rich linguistic knowledge they attain (the “poverty of the stimulus” argument). The knowledge of Universal Grammar would serve to bridge that gap.
Interesting. When our children were between 4 and 8 we moved and lived in Holland for a few years. The kids spoke Dutch within a couple of months. It would take an adult many years.
LikeLike
I remember reading an article about ‘creole’ languages. The interesting phenomenon is that youngsters develope a new language which is a hybrid of two or more parent languages, yet develope rules of grammar, sentence structure, etc, that don’t exist in any of the parent languages. Some philologists argue that certain aspects of speech and language are hardwired into our brains.
LikeLike
Again, Lehan, you write in your inimitable style, simply, clearly …
I did not watch the ‘celebrations’, there is so much fresh misery happening in the world, I have to give the older tragedies a miss.
LikeLike
H, nothing so sad as stale misery. Spelt “ALP” ? Or “ABC” ?
LikeLike
Yes, the fun of melancholiness, is greatly exaggerated. can we have some uber un-grief Pleeeese?
LikeLike
Well done Lehan.
America is rapidly getting less Everywhere. Just tonight a sensible Obama trying to cut debt by raising taxes on the rich at the same level as the middle earners. The Republicans oppose it and want cuts from the Government instead.
Anyway, death inevitably a result of terminal materialism. It worked for a while (for the rich), but I doubt it worked out for the millions of inhabitants of trailer-homes or those other millions without health care, the millions of home-less, the prisoners, the victims of endless wars.
I heard Chomsky is walking tall lately.
LikeLike
Good little vigne-tty-wotsisname Lehan.
I travelled a bit in America. Liked parts and not others. My daughter had her 2nd birthday there. In Florida.
I like parts of Australia; not all. Same with anywhere really.
LikeLike
“America, America, God shed his grace on thee…”, because you surely need it now, more than any other time since you began misinterpreting Tom Paine over 200 years ago.
Marvelous piece of McLuanist deconstruction Lehan. Never was the medium more the message; and it remains intractably so today.
LikeLike
One original dlittante dude.
LikeLike