Tags
Painting and Story by Lehan Winifred Ramsay
Where does education come from? The shop. The shop where the applications come from, the tablet comes from. But not where the school comes from, nor the teachers. We might say that the technological corporations will become the institution, and the teachers and schools will become the software and hardware for distributing them.
Technology’s best trick is always to change the way we understand things to be. An invisible cloak? This does not mean that it is invisible, it just means that we can’t see it. The same trick with education, which is getting pushed and pummelled over a degree or too until it means βaccessβ. Is it such a big difference, that while access used to be the ability to get into a school, it now means the ability to have an internet connection and a device for looking? Is it possible for me too to change my thinking about this, to consider that schools have for too long had control of education, that freeing it up might just give us something new?
But I find education about technology to be a little shallow, more of a review than a critique, more instruction than reflection, and I wonder if education through technology will be more of the same. Not surprising then, that RMIT is leading the way in Teacher re-education by introducing its new Behaviour Capability Framework; guidelines for the way one should present oneself as an RMIT employee. But can we really blame short-attention-spanned HR/PR practices for this? Surely we could have foreseen the moment that technology took on education and won?
We are all heading for the clouds. Up in the clouds is everything we do, deliberately and absentmindedly, and that everything is becoming us. We don’t need to know everything any more. We just need to know how to find it. We can review it, we can critique it and it’s not even possible any more to edit it. Soon it will be difficult to critique it too, as criticism turns itself ever-so-slightly and becomes a negative behaviour, and we will stop that, forgetting we ever had the power to do so. Technology’s second best trick, after all, is to quickly replicate itself, removing a feature here or there, that we quickly forget we ever had.
Education is heading toward becoming a search engine. Not, though, until search engines are superseded by the next big data retrieval system. Leaving us always a little behind in our capabilities. We need to know how to find things. Technology needs to know what we can find. So sadly, though we might dream of education breaking from its archaic bonds and becoming a revolutionary force, it’s unlikely to happen.
I don’t dream of that. Education breaking from its archaic bonds. I like technology. I like it because it babysits me when I am bored and at the boundaries of my physical environment. I like to read, and write, and think. Technology gives me crayons and scraps of paper, and when I am bored, something pink or flashing. It helps me to remember that I am a Lifelong Learner, and it tells me where and how to get my education. This education is very nice to me, it encourages me to start and doesn’t get strict with me when I stop. Oh, that’s okay. Pick it up when you feel like it. It lets me pick and choose and move on if I’m bored, and best of all it lets me feel like I am really smart. Not like education used to be. I found it difficult! Even, at times, a struggle!
But we have a good relationship now, technology and me, and I can be who I am. Who I am is a little limited, of course. I am a dilettante, a dabbler, a jack-of-all-trades. I now have a motivational quotation for everything. A bit like a specialist in HR/PR, I now have at my fingertips the wisdom of the world’s greatest thinkers. And what did Einstein say about that? Something inspirational, I’ll just go look it up.
I don’t have to rely on myself any more. I think that has made me a better person. Other people seem to have done and said things that where much smarter than I would. So it makes sense to draw upon their experience, instead of having to do whatever I am doing again. And again, till I get it right. And again, till I bloody understand it.
I like those tablets. I am hoping that they will soon make one that I can swallow. Pictures of cheap shoes will appear in my eyeballs, and my fingers will twitch to touch something, shooting sensory memory-like data back into my nerve endings which I will recognize only as inherent knowledge β my own wisdom, my own intuitions. Isn’t that where we’re going with tablets? Or have I got the technology industry confused with the medical industry? I’ll just check. Oh. It’s Moses. Not Pfizer. Anyway I like them, though I wish they would make them as small as my Smart Phone, so I can hang them both around my neck.
In FACT I want to be able to hook them together, my tablet and my Smart Phone. If you put them together, they would give you TWICE the screen size! That would be very, very cool. Perhaps I could get them to argue with each other about what I should do next. Though probably only if they were products from each of the two rival groups. Being Smart, though they would probably resort to trickery, an attempt to discredit each other’s information, until I was well and truly confused. What would I do then? I would put them on the ground, take a stick, stand it up, and choose the device it fell toward.
Education comes from the shop. It has always come from the shop. It’s not a small thing, to remember that. Shops are nothing new. All those pithy quotes by our world leaders are Shop Talk of old. Nothing new there, HR/PR people.

We now are being asked for a true education through a fablet. This might have come about, as the name suggests, by a romantic combination between a phone and tablet.
We were escaping our almost insurmountable task of getting normal Internet and phone connections working, by taking the kids to a large shopping centre. You know those places were people get their purses cleaned out. Inevitably we came past a mobile phone shop counter with dazzling displays of ‘free’ phones with many plans. I noticed the latest of ‘fablets’.
I have given up asking what all those inventions actually do. I will never get an answer or perhaps , at best, ‘ lots of stuff and does things and interconnect with apps.’
In the meantime, struggle, struggle with our ‘mini wi-fi’ and dropping out. Optus just telling us to get yet another system with an antenna. Or, try putting it in your garden… Unbelievable.
LikeLike
In the garden with your gnome, Gerard? A row of mixed gnomes and wi-fi gadgetry?
Believe it, how deeply that engages me. π
LikeLike
I’m thinking about all the word links this fablet brings up. Fabulous, fable, table, let. As well as taking advantage of the pre-existing tablet. A lot of people love a new word – I guess they’ll be the buyers.
LikeLike
Fandangle…
LikeLike
I wish that education made people into better beings,not just more learned, but also more cvilized…
A rough and crude professor who might have studied the best literature in the world, but remained an ignoramus without culture,then the book learning has been a waste of time , in my books…
LikeLike
H, we once had a professor of Economics who had a major personality disorder. When he lectured, he used to try to avoid eye contact by looking to the extreme left – sort of out the window. So one time we organised the whole class to peer in from outside. Students 1, prof nil. He was also a mumbler and on another occasion, when one of the brave lads asked him to speak up please, he told the chap to “get a hearing aid”. Things have moved on a bit and I’m hoping that not even that old (now deceased) bastard wouldn’t be game to say something as abusive as that. I had a total disinterest in his subject and with a couple of minor exceptions, I probably still do.
LikeLike
Some of the highlights of abuse in our lives has occurred in classrooms/lecture theatres in Australia. I think the cause is having students in school for more hours than is conscionable and a structure designed in such a way it looks a safe bet to stream into the army, navy, airforce or manufacturing lollies.
LikeLike
Interesting vis-a-vis the personality or otherwise disorders of the older generation…in the community group of writers I looked out for in Adelaide there were a number of ageing men showed up who were exploring their latterly recognised and diagnosed learning disabilities post-careers in which they successfully winged it through tasks they couldn’t accomplish or had handed them over to people who could (wives, secretaries, etcet).
LikeLike
Amazing, isn’t it, what ISN’T included in the idea of “talent”. The ability to make up for a short-fall is rarely regarded as talented. But how resourceful they are.
LikeLike
One became an avid writer of poetry as one cannot suppose anyone would past 70 years of age, insisting he had simply never thought to before.
LikeLike
The image of you students Ripperzoff peering in a window to attempt to catch the eye of the Professor but could well be a metaphor to soothe the dispirited unseen talented. π
LikeLike
It comes from being fortunate enough to have excellent parents, being born with all faculties working and from being lucky to have some great teachers and an enquiring mind.
LikeLike
A lot of punch in such a short comment, Viv.
One of our enduring issues with Tim the Cabin Boy is that although he’s bright, he is yet to show us his inquiring mind. I think that one (apart from the faculties) is the key – an inquiring mind can overcome many of the other missing elements.
Once Emmlet 1’s science teacher said that the child asked too many questions ! We were gob smacked, but since the ex and I both have science degrees, we told E1 to lay off in class and ask us – also we got the young student an excellent chemistry tutor – and that turned into a passion for the subject and an advanced science degree and an entry into medicine.
Inquiring mind indeed – and a hard worker that likes to do the thinking for themselves.
LikeLike
In my first year at high school my home teacher said the same thing to my mother, i.e. that I asked too many questions. Apparently this was interpreted as not respecting one’s teachers. Some were pretty weird in those days. But they still do it you say. Unreal.
LikeLike
Yes, I wish some people would download an app to make them smarter, or wiser, or perhaps less reliant on their smart phones!
LikeLike
Now WAIT a minute, young man. The ball gets hit back? What kind of a game is THAT? I’ve only experienced the “lob the ball and wait for the umpire to send you off” version. I’m not sure about this talking back thing. Are you sure this is a game we play in these modern days? The shopkeepers never taught me what to do if someone hits the ball back. How irritating. I thinkβ¦β¦It’s clear thatβ¦According to Foulcaultβ¦..I, um, I’ll get back to you.
LikeLike
Ah yes. I remember what they taught me. What you can say depends on the placement of your post. Oh, and try to get the other person sent off. Whenever possible.
LikeLike
Getting the other person sent off ! Hilarious ! I never even touched her, ref !
LikeLike
Yes, that sounds familiar.
LikeLike
(Note to Ed. Are you sure he’s not trying to trump me here, with the University of Canberra reference?)
LikeLike
Note to self. Find something on University of Canberra.
LikeLike
Dr Ramsay. I’ve been asked to lend a hand by the HR department. They are advising to say nothing about the University of Canberra until we figure out where it is. In the meantime we suggest you try to keep the discourse strictly to the game of tennis, and we’re hoping to find and send you some Foulcault tennis references to back you up. Regarding your strategy we’re suggesting you spend a bit of time on Pell Vs Dawkins, with perhaps a little “Where’s the ball? Here’s the ball” obfuscation thrown in. Good Luck.
LikeLike
Yes I TRIED asking him where this University of Canberra is, he’s given me some online place. I think he’s having me on. Whoever heard of an online University? Do the HR people have anything yet?
LikeLike
Dr Ramsay. Please abandon “UCLA regrets sending mistaken acceptance letters”, we suspect it may be a different institution, HR is checking that. I think the Pell/Dawkins is working well but a few statistics would look good here.
LikeLike
Can you ask the HR department to check if he’s got the racquet cover off yet? It’s getting a little chilly in these Tennis Shorts.
LikeLike
Sometimes when I read your pieces, Lehan, I have the joy of an observer of the spontaneous creativity of the excellent exponent. Imagine watching one of the great tennis matches where the strategy of one great plays out against another and the layers of meaning overlap and create new understanding. I feel quite lot like a privileged onlooker.
There are lots of interesting ideas to play with here. I’m just stretching and taking off my racquet cover. I hope I’m up for the game sufficiently to do it justice. Now, which shot to try to return ?
I was reading another interesting piece – this time by a young female journalist student of the University of Canberra – over at Crikey.com – dealing with the fact that she had been pressured by her own university to rescind a Freedom of Information application she had made seeking information about how the university planed to save money by crippling the B. Journo degree – and also about how that august organisation was planning to sponsor th Brumbies rugby team. Nice.
Does education come from the shop ? Or is it from overcoming the bastardry of the shop owners ?
This might have a bit of resonance for you. Sorry about that !
LikeLike
Mr Ripperzoff,
Thankyou for your kind words. Whether or not it’s what a naive person would conceive as nothing or something that a sophisticated physicist would consider to be nothing, it is going to be something much much simpler than a creative intelligence. We are struggling – we’re all struggling, even scientists are struggling, to explain how we get the fantastic order and complexity of the universe, out of very simple and therefore easy to understand, easy to explain, beginnings.
LikeLike
Yes. I believe it was Michel Foulcault’s reading of the emerging self in the 19th century which underlined this, particularly regarding the exploits of Patrick Rafter, the recently recrowned US Open tennis champion.
Incidently, I’m fascinated by your reference to the University of Canberra situation. Where was that, exactly?
LikeLike
Can’t supply the answer to that Lehan but I know where the lake is. I fell in it once out of an overtipping canoe.
Just sneaking in here to say I larffed at the delightful word play around ‘shop’ and ‘shop talk’ and like the piccy. I went over to your website a few days ago and had a browse too. I have been looking to see if you are offering any of these images for t-shirts
PS Could you pease send your address detail to Ripperzoff so he can send them on to me and I can post parcel. Thank you. π
LikeLike
Shall do, Shoe. My tshirts are all gone, by the way.
LikeLike
Tuesday’s Crikey.com Article 14.
“14. Uni of Canberra ‘restructure’ … and how students were warned off the story
Lauren Ingram, a University of Canberra journalism student, writes:
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST, JOURNALISM EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA
In an attempt to avoid the “legal burden” of Freedom of Information legislation, the University of Canberra has pressured four journalism students into withdrawing FOI applications targeting controversial stories involving UC administration.
But despite legal threats and warnings of disciplinary action levelled by the faculty of arts and design, a fifth student refused to withdraw her FOI — submitted to try to extract the truth behind planned cuts to UC’s bachelor of journalism. I am that student.
My classmates and I submitted the FOIs under ACT legislation as part of a final-year investigative journalism assignment — ironically, one of the units UC is axing. But the stonewalling that greeted student requests for information finally gave way late last Thursday, minutes after UC delivered me over 400 pages of documentation in response to my FOI request — an act of investigative journalism that they tried to force me to abandon, with threats that grew as the deadline neared.
A week before the university was legally required to release the documents to students whoβd submitted FOI requests, we received an email from our lecturer, Crispin Hull, asking us, on behalf of UC to withdraw our FOI applications.
“The FOI office feels swamped and will have to spend a lot of time and enormous cost with your FOI requests … [the FOI officer] would like to be relieved of the legal burden of having to fulfil the FOI requests according to the FOI Act,” Hull wrote.
He requested we formally drop our FOI requests in exchange for a guest lecture from David Hamilton, the university’s FOI officer: “It would be good if you could officially withdraw your FOI requests as soon as possible and in return we will get [David’s] FOI insights and you will get the opportunity to ask him questions about the FOI process. I think this will go further towards achieving our educational aims than doggedly persisting with the formal FOI process.”
Every student, except me, withdrew their request at the urging of their lecturer. I told the lecturer the request went against “everything I’ve been taught about journalism”.
Shortly after I sent this email, the deputy dean of arts and design, professor Greg Battye, instructed Hull to pass on a message to me as the one remaining student refusing to withdraw their FOI request. Battye cited UC legal advice and said to let me know that if I continued with the FOI it could result in a breach of the student conduct rules. Such breaches can lead to expulsion or exclusion from university, or being failed in the subject involved. Battye claimed he had a legal opinion that the assessment required UC academic ethics clearance, which had not been sought.
However, ethics clearance has never previously been required for journalism students to write an assessable story — not even one about the University of Canberra. I believe this was just another attempt to frighten me off investigating a potentially negative story on UC by accessing documents through FOI.
Dr Johan Lidberg, an FOI researcher and Monash University journalism academic, says that even asking someone to withdraw an FOI request is out of order.
“It’s completely inappropriate and against the spirit of FOI laws to pressure or even ask applicants to drop requests,” Dr Lidberg said. “FOI is a democratic accountability tool β¦ to pressure someone to withdraw an information request could be seen as undemocratic and would probably not be viewed favourably should the case progress to an appeal.”
Ella Fisher, president of the UC Press Club, also expressed disappointment: “We are taught to follow up on [FOI] requests and be persistent when faced with reluctance to complete them. We feel this reaction to the FOI requests sent to the university goes against what we are being taught in our degree.”
My next assignment will be to analyse the documents on the planned cuts to the journalism degree reluctantly released to me under FOI. The secrecy surrounding this “restructure” (which will reportedly involve the abolition of the bachelor of journalism qualification and the elimination of nearly half of the journalism practice units) motivated my FOI application. There’s been a serious lack of genuine student consultation and a remarkable amount of spin-doctoring from UC.
But one of the four FOI requests withdrawn under pressure from UC management involved a more controversial issue — the awarding of naming-rights sponsorship of the ACT Brumbies rugby team to the university. Details of the deal — including the cost to UC — are still being withheld from the public.
Questions were put to the university and the FOI office today. Battye declined to comment, saying he was unable to meet Crikey’s deadline, and the FOI office did not respond by deadline.
Send your tips to boss@crikey.com.au or submit them anonymously here.
RELATED LINKS
Journalism education honour roll: why teaching media matters | Exposed! The secret Crikey ABC emails the Herald Sun wants you to see | Innovation in journalism: an
“
LikeLike
It was always a case of just a slightly different from the previous generation. That’s a scientific point which I think is quite interesting, I’m not sure if it has a theological significance exCEPT, that I think successive popes have tried to suggest that the soul did indeed get added, rather like gin to tonic, at some particular point during evolution – that at some point during evolution there was no soul and then later, there was one. So it is quite an interesting question to ask.
LikeLike
Well an interesting piece, Mr Rippersoff. Incidently, I’m just a little curious. How did these students actually FIND the office? They’re always so well hidden. You don’t happen to have an ADDRESS, do you?
LikeLike
Which is why as the generations go by, animals get better at doing what they do. That is quintessentially non-random. It does not mean there’s a purpose, in the sense of a human purpose in the sense of a guiding principle which is thought up in advance. With hindsight you can say something like a bird’s wing looks as though it has a purpose, a human eye looks as though has a purpose, but it has come about through the process of non-random, natural selection, there is no purpose in the human sense, there’s a kind of pseudo purpose, but it’s not a purpose in the human sense of conscious guiding. But above all I must stress that Darwinian evolution is a non-random process. One of the biggest misunderstandings, which I’m sorry to say that the Cardinal has just perpetrated, is that evolution is a random process. It is the opposite of a random process.
LikeLike
There is massive amount of suffering in the natural world, a huge amount of suffering, and it seems to me that that’s an almost natural consequence of Darwinian Natural Selection. I’m more interested however in what’s true, than what I would like to be true.
LikeLike
(Dawkins, QI). But of course, we can’t rely solely on our Scientist Brethren to explain tennis to us. There is something mystical, almost – yes, divine, about the game of tennis.
LikeLike
Strange, I’d never heard of the University of Canberra journalism course and now I hear two stories? The first about you mentioned, Emm, in Crikey – the second over at The Australian (one of their rare free pages) about Journalism professors in trouble for passing students with failing grades.
He also did not believe reliance on international students had driven down standards across the board. “It’s not that systematic.
“It might be a certain department or a particular degree, but not across the board,” he said.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/a-lack-of-objective-review-of-students-work-is-a-structural-problem/story-e6frgcjx-1226328213558
LikeLike