Story and Reading by Christina Binning Wilson
That asylum seekers are being sent to Papua New Guinea is outrageous outcome and destination. I wonder what outcome can be expected for Papua New Guinea. My heart bleeds.
The election is not only about boats, a flogged horse is still a horse of course, but education, electricity prices, energy use, environment, digital security, broadband and so on e.g. the dole that is starvation, homelessness, risk orientation, policy as similarly cruel and callous and retrogressive. It is about gender and how that is acknowledged. The election is about policy development and every other aspect of the administration. It is about parliamentary processes more than it has ever been, about who is rooting for who-how-whoever you are regardless whether you know the aforementioned poem ‘The Second Coming’ by Yeats* and whether we get it from Malcolm’s reading.
It might have a bearing. I don’t want any hope of Malcolm Turnbull becoming PM and think there is even less real chance.
My reading of The Second Coming
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=237u6dTr6s0
What justifies Malcolm’s isolation, seeking to bond a pod, a cast at a podcast, of a concept that all the men in Coriolanus are very unattractive and we can suppose he means not very nice?
One of the important (all Shakespeare’s characters are important) characters of the male gender is, in fact, a baby, Coriolanus’ infant son and for all we know from Malcolm’s description he is not there. True, who said anything about the baby, about fair (or inclusion). True, it looks as if the kid does not have much hope surrounded by (ipso facto) these less than even half OK fellers (yuk! boy germs).
Playing a contemporary gallery. Nothing is more attractive to men and perhaps women an adviser said than a man who decries the behaviour of men.
Yet, the play has a significant component of domestic drama that is explicit and implicit. No reference to the plight of the war hero on a domestic and political and social front after returning home when the battle is won (I recall at University we thrashed the discussion about the feelings of our own soldiers and especially the effects on them of the cold shoulder they received). Yes, there are riots going down that are pretty severe because Rome in my own recall had emptied its coffers. The proletariat by whom he once was hailed as hero are laid low result of their starvation diets and bearing their fardels (can’t remember where that is, but didn’t forget).
Move in closer. A keynote speech is delivered by a woman in ‘Coriolanus’. Not a mention of it.
20 years ago, and it is 20 years on, I wrote the poem ‘Coriolanus’, considering what I witnessed in my life experience to the event of the 1987 financial collapse. What I felt. I would write a series of poems reflecting not the chronology, stories or a specific representation of characters, but a thought image about human behaviour that was direct result of thinking about loved Shakespearian images … where on my psychological map had I arrived.
Coriolanus *
Pulling the wings off butterflies
I am disappointed;
But I must persist.
Watching the butterflies
I am singing
Clear
Loud.
This is a song.
This is the recall.
Savagery has a gossamer thread.
I must paint it.
* cf the play by William Shakespeare; Coriolanus’ son is being reared by his paternal grandmother while the General is at war and [I made the error it was the grandmother] she is recounting watching the boy chase a butterfly, ‘mammocking’ them. She proclaims her grandson, with pride, his father’s son.
‘Coriolanus’ to me -not Shakespeare’s play, but my poem in this reference – is a signifier, a meditation, as much as a diary note. I wrote it equally as proof of my mind map and marker, of an interest in human behaviour and determination.
It was a friend visiting the family, Valeria, who declared (without reproof) the definitive speech revealing the child’s upbringing.
Malcolm has completely removed friendship from the play. I think it is difficult to have a lack of it without its important presence. Coriolanus has a friend who tries on the streets among the people to get information and mediate on his behalf. Not an unattractive trait. Menenius counsels the proletariat to fear what the power of the administrators can do and employs words of tact by way of contrast to Coriolanus displaying apparently insolent behaviour towards his countrymen in the opening scene. The setting is laid out for us to see civil unrest when the army of Volscians bent on invasion reaches Rome. The economy is already on shaky ground. Coriolanus is sent to engage the Volscians and defeat them.
We however are privy to detail of relationships that are rich between the soldiers of the army, and senators, patricians, between women and men, not one dimensional (whenever to anybody’s knowledge was Shakespeare one-dimensional) including inference again Coriolanus commands respect in banter and joking that is not malevolent. He has purpose, is pumped for war with a band of brothers. When he returns, anxious for his standing, he meets even with protestations in his defence of proletariat who declare him virtuous, worthy of honour and reward. Nothing is black and white regards all men being ‘unattractive’ implied as no other as Malcolm proselytises. Nobody’s descriptive powers could be stripped further from the pages of Coriolanus by Malcolm. A crafted thoroughfare of bustling activity, demonstrations, controversy, trouble; opinion and diversity are deleted from viewpoint by Malcolm’s implication not a man was worth a pinch of salt. Apparently clever remarks at the forum tick boxes. Might we be able to not titter, but instead rise to our feet discarding falsely shallow repartee and point to the emperors?
In Act 3 Volumina and her daughter Virgilia, Coriolanus’ wife, mother of the child are at home in surrounds we soon realise are opulent and comfortable. The signifier is the grouping; the play is a psychological drama about a man of standing because of his military skills and prowess, raised by a mother who values the characteristics of stoic forebearance and a war mongerer and companioned by a compliant wife; the crucial keynote speech is not the death speech by Coriolanus, but the attention the visitor, Valeria draws to the child and the child’s behaviour. Equally important is Shakespeare presents to us Coriolanus’ mother, Volumina discussing the mental state of separation from him with her worried daughter-in-law; her preoccupation is pride in his position as a war hero and the child’s mother’s concern for his safe return, but more questioning the mother’s viewpoint.
We are shown powerfully the generational and societal influences making the boy as it made the man.
Valeria, discussed at length in High School that she could be dispensed with out of the plot (I recall) bulks up numbers visiting Volumina, the mother and Virgilia, the wife with purpose in my view of stage presentation and story, to show the influences surrounding the mother of the baby, Virgilia, dominated by Volumina, their female grouping, their pasttimes not for trivia, not intended for deletion, but the scene is dark predicating the hopelessness of Virgilia’s position whatever it was she may have wanted for herself and her child … even trivial expectations to leave aside work (needlework) displayed by their visitor (the noblewoman, Valeria) of Virgilia, but she begs she will not leave her post loyally waiting for Coriolanus, her husband.
Heed Valeria, her excitement and pride in the destructive future she envisages in store for the small child.
VALERIA
O’ my word, the father’s son: I’ll swear,’tis a
very pretty boy. O’ my troth, I looked upon him o’
Wednesday half an hour together: has such a
confirmed countenance. I saw him run after a gilded
butterfly: and when he caught it, he let it go
again; and after it again; and over and over he
comes, and again; catched it again; or whether his
fall enraged him, or how ’twas, he did so set his
teeth and tear it; O, I warrant it, how he mammocked
it!
Text of Coriolanus
* http://www.opensourceshakespeare.org/views/plays/playmenu.php?WorkID=coriolanus

PS: ‘Shoe: I am reasonably confident that Malcolm Turnbull went to an expensive private school. Upon what evidence do I base my statement? I can hear you ask. Upon the fact that only a private school would enable a pupil to be conversant with the text, and completely out to lunch with the sentiment.
LikeLike
Guffaw. It is absolutely fabulous to meet you here at the bar, Venise. You and me go back a long way now online, while not generations yet. 🙂
My beloved aunt (she and I have the same name 🙂 ) was the Classics Mistress as they called them and might still do at Somerville House Presbyterian (in those days and I think still or Uniting or something) Girls Boarding and Day private school and not that she’s responsible for my understanding of this particular play of William’s. 😉
I am a State School kid. You’re spot on there.
LikeLike
Shakespeare should never be touched by those that have connection to conservatives or liberals. We all know that. Having said that, my own connections are a bit like understanding cricket; zilch.
It is gene that I sadly lack. One has to be born and bred in the culture to really appreciate both, at least in my case.
Even so, I do appreciate ; A rose by any other name smells just as good etc.
But Shoe, your writing is something else. The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it..
lovely word order Shoe. Thank you.
LikeLike
It is quite amazing that what I have written translates well enough for you, Gerard, even though you do not have a grounding sufficient in it to understand it. It’s pretty damned hard I personally reckon, take it from one who tries to read Shakepsearean plays these days that I am not familiar with. Mind you, reading a comic I used to equally devour is a bit of a stressor.
I do think as well it is a cultural understanding and my father was well educated in literature in his Scottish home, particularly because his mother was a teacher before she married. Again, that is a simplification because I cannot recall he drew my attention to the intrinsic importance of the women to the Coriolanus’ plot … but it is something in the air and he did quote Shakespeare and educated me to read Dickens. The genetic charge is a bit charged. William was an Englishman. 😉
LikeLike
Ah, the Libs and their spin! (and the Labs and their moral abomination!)
They won’t curtail their audacity to steal and mutilate anything for the purposes of… spinning and mutilating anything!
Thank you, Christina (best of names, being one that one of darlings is called by) for giving this idiot a flick over his ear for doing all that spinning and mutilating.
Obviously, his adoring fans are too uneducated to know what the fool has done, or else, they adore the practice of spinning and mutilating anything, including the words and the message by a poet, light years away from Mal’s jack boots.
He’s not a poet! The word means a “creator” in the sense that only things or ideas of virtue may be called “creations” -or else they are either accidents or extrications of evil minds; and he is certainly not a reader of creative works, unless one calls lawyer’s briefs, creative works.
There isn’t a play that Shakespeare has written which comprises nothing but evil. There isn’t a play that he has written that is so simplistic, so one-dimensional as to be completely clogged with Evil! Evil, is always tempered by, or at least pitted against, contrasted with, virtue, against good. Always! And, as you correctly pointed out, Coriolanus is no exception.
Good work, Christina!
LikeLike
I am really tired from writing for a few days across a raft of subjects, Atomou. It’s almost all I can do to squeak out “I’ve so badly missed you Atomou.” I treasure your assessment of what I have written, Ato.
Yes, that’s really poor behaviour from that assemblage isn’t it and super poor on his part.
I hope we get a chance to talk again soon, Atomou. Goodnight for now.
LikeLike
Therése: Such passion, such understanding of the great Bard. (I thought Malcolm Turnbull had Buckley’s understanding of Will Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, and it’s pretentious to quote someone if one doesn’t really know one’s subject.)
Recently I came across a compete gem at my nearest JB HiFi. (and I’m saying this to make you envious-if you haven’t already got it. More importantly, IMHO it’s worth trying to track it down.) It is the Royal Shakespeare company (1984) directed by John Barton, how to act Shakespeare. Some of the players include Ben Kingsley, Ian McKellen, Patrick Stewart, David Suchet, Judi Dench, Lisa Harrow, Donald Sinden, Richard Pascoe, Sinéad Cusack, etc.
Barton does the work by showing Character and Language; Speeches and Soliloquies; how to Treat the Verse; Poetry, Irony and Ambiguity; Passion and Coolness, and so forth. To see David Suchet as Shylock running rings around Patrick Stewart is joy.
It’s an ITV, Acorn Media {acornmediaau.com} production.
Sorry to bore you with the details, but you’ll understand just how pretentious Malcolm Turnbull is.
Cheers
Venise
LikeLike
Venise, hello, it sometimes happens that an occasional misunderstanding arises that Therese is the author of other people’s stories and I think that has happened in this case. I send my contributions to him to edit it if if he chooses and he loads them. I wrote this one.
Yes, I thought Malcolm had Buckleys. I don’t know about pretentious as much as revealing how he plays the field and he might be a great deal more grown up by now than he was showing himself there. If he happens on this critique he might consider running with the lesson and emerge as a more grounded individual. I have often wondered where he received his education. Mine is not crash hot. It’s better.
I might find a copy of the DVD set you talk about here. That sounds interesting. I saw a photo of that line-up visiting Oliver Sacks, the neurologist, coincidentally, so they keep good company. 🙂
Many thanks, Venise.
LikeLike
Oo er, ‘SHOE, I guess I should have picked up on a different syntax.
It is an excellent article and I congratulate you. BTW, I wasn’t happy either re using the word pretentious, but, I got stuck for a better word.
Please do yourself a favour and try to run that DVD to earth. You will love it.
Once again, apologies.
Cheers
V
LikeLike
awwww, no worries for apologies, Venise. Thank you again, very much.
LikeLike