• The Pig’s Arms
  • About
  • The Dump

Window Dresser's Arms, Pig & Whistle

~ The Home Pub of the Famous Pink Drinks and Trotter's Ale

Window Dresser's Arms, Pig & Whistle

Tag Archives: Malcolm Turnbull

Riding Instructions for 2017: Time to Abandon the Least Worst.

01 Sunday Jan 2017

Posted by Therese Trouserzoff in Emmjay, Politics in the Pig's Arms

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

Australian politics, Bill Hayden, Democracy, Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, Malcolm Fraser, Malcolm Turnbull, Tony Abbott

4713254284_016e1c921b_b

Story by Emmjay

I watched an American Ted Talk yesterday where the chap was arguing something along the lines of “OK we’ve seen what the protest vote gets the world (Trump that is), fair enough, people have a right to be pissed off – and a right to send a message to conventional politicians that business as usual is no longer an option.”

He then went on to propose something particularly non-novel – namely direct action at a local level.

Well, OK to that, but so far direct action has had a pretty spotty track record. How long did it take for the Moratorium movement to reverse the politics of Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War ? No discernible progress on renewable energy or climate change or preventative health care.

I think that democracy is the right way to go, but not many allegedly democratic nations seem to be much good at ensuring that every person has a say and then deciding what parts of that “say” are worthy of enactment.

More importantly, a constituency where the uninformed or even plain stupid “will of the citizens” gets turned into policy that drives legislation or regulations simply (and only) because fuckwits have the numbers, is not good enough in my book.

When we see and hear politicians say that their views are accurately reflecting the will of their constituency, I say that they are not doing the whole job.

They should be able to reflect a considered view of their constituencies and then, in cases where that view is retrograde, they have a responsibility to propose better policies and then convince their electorates to support that.

But it’s a loaded deck, isn’t it ?

Simple-minded preferences by the proletariat have been demonstrably influenced by super powerful narrow sectional interests – not mentioning:

  • media moguls,
  • carbon energy tycoons,
  • food industry power groups,
  • big pharma,
  • the military industrial complex
  • the national and international banking industry
  • real estate moguls
  • big retailers
  • mining industries
  • water resources owners
  • major political parties
  • tax avoiders anonymous
  • And probably many more self interest cabals.

The fact that a clearly evil and unworthy emperor can become elected as the next head of the western world – with the approval of Russia – if not China and the rest of the west – proves the point.

Decent Republicans (if that’s not an oxymoron) reportedly voted for Hillary Clinton – their mortal political foe – as a least-worst option to no avail. And we have seen the pattern repeated here in Australia.   Despite being completely unknown outside of Queensland, Rudd massacred Howard – because the electorate disapproved so strongly of Howard that (as Bill Hayden was famously quoted) “A drover’s dog could have defeated Howard. But when the ALP – if not the rest of the country tired of Rudd’s control-freak ways and random policy walk, Australia was presented with a new PM and we had the privilege of watching internecine warfare destabilising what now appears to have been a relatively good Gillard government by contemporary standards. So our least worst option was to elect Tony Abbott despite his pig ignorant character, his 1950s misogyny, his climate change denialism and his cringe-worthy representation of Australia on the world stage.

Being not complete fools, the Libnats decided to punt Tony before the election and gave us the opportunity to support the popular Malcolm Turnbull. He was popular because he stood for the kind of conservatism that Australia traditionally likes – to cast fear and doubt about the ALP’s ability to manage an economy financially (despite Rudd’s undeniable success during the worst of the Global Financial Meltdown (GFM), and carry on with the “be nice and do nothing” kind of conservative approach to government.

Australians by and large aspire to some kind of fairness ethic and when the matter came to same sex marriage, Malcolm showed his true colours – colour me shit scared of the loony right wing faction – and the simplest, least earth-shattering change to marriage law was dropped unceremoniously into the “too hard” basket after an eternity of round the houses debates about plebiscites and free votes.

This is an interesting contradiction to my earlier point that democratically elected representatives ought do more than merely reflect the imagined will of their constituency – they should lead our society. In the case of same sex marriage issue, the Libnats actually led us back to the 1950s . It’s surprising that they didn’t recriminalise homosexuality.   And the ever-worthy ALP sat there, amused by the Libnats’ self-torture added a big fat zero to the table.

So when Malcolm decided to call an early election, Australia responded in accord with the times. We were clearly unable to pick the least worst candidates and by extension the least worst government. It was for all intents and purposes a dead heat. Labor and the Libnats were judged to be about equal in terms of uselessness.

Australia played it safe again – by electing a government not on predisposed to do sweet fuck all, but a government barely qualified to act on it’s disposition.

When I reflect on how Howard wasted more than a decade of Australian history, it’s astonishing that his complete lack of effort has been so overwhelmingly eclipsed by Rudd-Gillard-Rudd, Abbot, Turnbull, Turnbull, that total fuckwits now control the senate and the passing of legislation and regulation – even ideologically based and ethically wrong and criminal work like the cruel maltreatment of refugees, the repeated disenfranchisement of the poor, infirm and disabled from welfare – slips through parliament like a turd through a sewer pipe.

So how do we abandon the habit of picking the least worst governments ?

I think this is at least a two-step process.

First, we cannot accept a rotating front door to the leadership of Australian and state (and local) government bureaucracies. After all, the government – only makes the laws. It’s the various levels of public service that implement them. When Fraser sacked virtually all the heads of federal departments along imagined as well as real ideological grounds – and then let middle order management atrophy, he did Australia no service by setting a precedent for every government following – of both political persuasions. Australia has ended up with government by a public service characterised by top enders who must at least appear to be sympathetic with the government politicians of the day (no matter how loony and incompetent these politicians may be) supported by junior staffers who lack the experience of knowing when a bad policy will inevitably lead to disaster for the departments and possibly for the government as a whole. So I am advocating senior bureaucrats be selected on demonstrable merit by independent judges and that they enjoy the Westminster privilege of secure employment based on providing their ministers with frank and fearless advice.

The second plank in my platform is to advocate that we as Australians stop voting for parties that reflect a broad support for our individual ideological bents, particularly when the preselected (now there’s a topic to launch on !) representatives are clearly party toadies and / or unworthy of our support. Remember how Cheryl Kernot was far more effective as a Democrat than when she was later massacred by the electorate as a Labor stooge. Maxine McHugh ? Peter Garrett ?

I for one would prefer to vote for a person who showed commitment to the special needs not just of my electorate, but the current and future needs of our country. It’s our job to seek these people out. And to flush out the pond scum that so frequently graces our houses of parliament.

Off you go, then. Them’s your riding intructions for 2017.

‘Malcolm Turnbull – A Poet for PM’ ?

22 Monday Jul 2013

Posted by Therese Trouserzoff in Sandshoe

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

"The Second Coming", Coriolanus, Malcolm Turnbull, W.B. Yeats

From The Creative Review (online): 1965 poster by Ken Briggs

From The Creative Review (online): 1965 poster by Ken Briggs

Story and Reading by Christina Binning Wilson

That asylum seekers are being sent to Papua New Guinea is outrageous outcome and destination. I wonder what outcome can be expected for Papua New Guinea. My heart bleeds.

The election is not only about boats, a flogged horse is still a horse of course, but education, electricity prices, energy use, environment, digital security, broadband and so on e.g. the dole that is starvation, homelessness, risk orientation, policy as similarly cruel and callous and retrogressive. It is about gender and how that is acknowledged. The election is about policy development and every other aspect of the administration. It is about parliamentary processes more than it has ever been, about who is rooting for who-how-whoever you are regardless whether you know the aforementioned poem ‘The Second Coming’ by Yeats* and whether we get it from Malcolm’s reading.

It might have a bearing. I don’t want any hope of Malcolm Turnbull becoming PM and think there is even less real chance.

My reading of The Second Coming

*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=237u6dTr6s0

What justifies Malcolm’s isolation, seeking to bond a pod, a cast at a podcast, of a concept that all the men in Coriolanus are very unattractive and we can suppose he means not very nice?

One of the important (all Shakespeare’s characters are important) characters of the male gender is, in fact, a baby, Coriolanus’ infant son and for all we know from Malcolm’s description he is not there. True, who said anything about the baby, about fair (or inclusion). True, it looks as if the kid does not have much hope surrounded by (ipso facto) these less than even half OK fellers (yuk! boy germs).

Playing a contemporary gallery. Nothing is more attractive to men and perhaps women an adviser said than a man who decries the behaviour of men.

Yet, the play has a significant component of domestic drama that is explicit and implicit. No reference to the plight of the war hero on a domestic and political and social front after returning home when the battle is won (I recall at University we thrashed the discussion about the feelings of our own soldiers and especially the effects on them of the cold shoulder they received). Yes, there are riots going down that are pretty severe because Rome in my own recall had emptied its coffers. The proletariat by whom he once was hailed as hero are laid low result of their starvation diets and bearing their fardels (can’t remember where that is, but didn’t forget).

Move in closer. A keynote speech is delivered by a woman in ‘Coriolanus’.  Not a mention of it.

20 years ago, and it is 20 years on, I wrote the poem ‘Coriolanus’, considering what I witnessed in my life experience to the event of the 1987 financial collapse. What I felt.  I would write a series of poems reflecting not the chronology, stories or a specific representation of characters, but a thought image about human behaviour that was direct result of thinking about loved Shakespearian images … where on my psychological map had I arrived.

Coriolanus *

Pulling the wings off butterflies
I am disappointed;
But I must persist.

Watching the butterflies
I am singing
Clear
Loud.
This is a song.
This is the recall.
Savagery has a gossamer thread.

I must paint it.

* cf the play by William Shakespeare; Coriolanus’ son is being reared by his paternal grandmother while the General is at war and [I made the error it was the grandmother] she is recounting watching the boy chase a butterfly, ‘mammocking’ them. She proclaims her grandson, with pride, his father’s son.

‘Coriolanus’ to me -not Shakespeare’s play, but my poem in this reference – is a signifier, a meditation, as much as a diary note. I wrote it equally as proof of my mind map and marker, of an interest in human behaviour and determination.

It was a friend visiting the family, Valeria, who declared (without reproof) the definitive speech revealing the child’s upbringing.

Malcolm has completely removed friendship from the play. I think it is difficult to have a lack of it without its important presence. Coriolanus has a friend who tries on the streets among the people to get information and mediate on his behalf. Not an unattractive trait.  Menenius counsels the proletariat to fear what the power of the administrators can do and employs words of tact by way of contrast to Coriolanus displaying apparently insolent behaviour towards his countrymen in the opening scene. The setting is laid out for us to see civil unrest when the army of Volscians bent on invasion reaches Rome. The economy is already on shaky ground. Coriolanus is sent to engage the Volscians and defeat them.

We however are privy to detail of relationships that are rich between the soldiers of the army, and senators, patricians, between women and men, not one dimensional (whenever to anybody’s knowledge was Shakespeare one-dimensional) including inference again Coriolanus commands respect in banter and joking that is not malevolent. He has purpose, is pumped for war with a band of brothers. When he returns, anxious for his standing, he meets even with protestations in his defence of proletariat who declare him virtuous, worthy of honour and reward. Nothing is black and white regards all men being ‘unattractive’ implied as no other as Malcolm proselytises. Nobody’s descriptive powers could be stripped further from the pages of Coriolanus by Malcolm. A crafted thoroughfare of bustling activity, demonstrations, controversy, trouble; opinion and diversity are deleted from viewpoint by Malcolm’s implication not a man was worth a pinch of salt. Apparently clever remarks at the forum tick boxes. Might we be able to not titter, but instead rise to our feet discarding falsely shallow repartee and point to the emperors?

In Act 3 Volumina and her daughter Virgilia, Coriolanus’ wife, mother of the child are at home in surrounds we soon realise are opulent and comfortable. The signifier is the grouping; the play is a psychological drama about a man of standing because of his military skills and prowess, raised by a mother who values the characteristics of stoic forebearance and a war mongerer and companioned by a compliant wife; the crucial keynote speech is not the death speech by Coriolanus, but the attention the visitor, Valeria draws to the child and the child’s behaviour. Equally important is Shakespeare presents to us Coriolanus’ mother, Volumina discussing the mental state of separation from him with her worried daughter-in-law; her preoccupation is pride in his position as a war hero and the child’s mother’s concern for his safe return, but more questioning the mother’s viewpoint.

We are shown powerfully the generational and societal influences making the boy as it made the man.

Valeria, discussed at length in High School that she could be dispensed with out of the plot (I recall) bulks up numbers visiting Volumina, the mother and Virgilia, the wife with purpose in my view of stage presentation and story, to show the influences surrounding the mother of the baby, Virgilia, dominated by Volumina, their female grouping, their pasttimes not for trivia, not intended for deletion, but the scene is dark predicating the hopelessness of Virgilia’s position whatever it was she may have wanted for herself and her child … even trivial expectations to leave aside work (needlework) displayed by their visitor (the noblewoman, Valeria) of Virgilia, but she begs she will not leave her post loyally waiting for Coriolanus, her husband.

Heed Valeria, her excitement and pride in the destructive future she envisages in store for the small child.

VALERIA

O’ my word, the father’s son: I’ll swear,’tis a
very pretty boy. O’ my troth, I looked upon him o’
Wednesday half an hour together: has such a
confirmed countenance. I saw him run after a gilded
butterfly: and when he caught it, he let it go
again; and after it again; and over and over he
comes, and again; catched it again; or whether his
fall enraged him, or how ’twas, he did so set his
teeth and tear it; O, I warrant it, how he mammocked
it!

Text of Coriolanus

* http://www.opensourceshakespeare.org/views/plays/playmenu.php?WorkID=coriolanus

Malcolm Turnbull – a Poet for PM !

20 Saturday Jul 2013

Posted by Therese Trouserzoff in Emmjay, Poets Corner, Politics in the Pig's Arms

≈ 14 Comments

Tags

:Poets at the Pigs, Malcolm Turnbull, poetry reading

ac-poll-main-20130719094612795303-620x349

What rough beast slinks towards the Prime Ministership ?

from Brisbane Times  Friday 19th July…

“Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has played down a new opinion poll showing that the Coalition could win an election in a landslide if Malcolm Turnbull was leading the Liberal Party.

A ReachTel poll for the Seven Network released on Friday shows the Coalition leading Labor 58 to 42 per cent, on a two-party preferred basis, with Mr Turnbull at the helm.

With Mr Abbott in charge, the Coalition lead narrows to 51 to 49 per cent.

The poll also shows Mr Turnbull leading Kevin Rudd as preferred prime minister 65 to 35 per cent against the Labor leader’s 52 to 48 per cent advantage over Mr Abbott.

Conducted on Thursday night, the poll of 2922 residents nation-wide had a margin of error of 1.8 per cent.”

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2013/we-want-malcolm-turnbull-voters-say-20130719-2q87x.html#ixzz2ZX60EF9M

Friends of the Pig’s Arms – I never thought I’d ever say this, but …..

Malcolm Turnbull is far, far in front of Rudd and that unspeakable Lycra clad buffoon in terms of some of the character traits a person (I believe) should have to lead a nation.

Here’s the proof:  recorded at his recent appearance at the Pig’s Arms  Poets at the Pigs…

Malcolm Turnbull

Patrons Posts

  • The Question-Crafting Compass November 15, 2025
  • The Dreaming Machine November 10, 2025
  • Reflections on Intelligence — Human and Artificial October 26, 2025
  • Ikigai III May 17, 2025
  • Ikugai May 9, 2025
  • Coalition to Rebate All the Daylight Saved April 1, 2025
  • Out of the Mouths of Superheroes March 15, 2025
  • Post COVID Cooking February 7, 2025
  • What’s Goin’ On ? January 21, 2025

We've been hit...

  • 713,777 times

Blogroll

  • atomou the Greek philosopher and the ancient Greek stage
  • Crikey
  • Gerard & Helvi Oosterman
  • Hello World Walk along with Me
  • Hungs World
  • Lehan Winifred Ramsay
  • Neville Cole
  • Politics 101
  • Sandshoe
  • the political sword

We've been hit...

  • 713,777 times

Patrons Posts

  • The Question-Crafting Compass November 15, 2025
  • The Dreaming Machine November 10, 2025
  • Reflections on Intelligence — Human and Artificial October 26, 2025
  • Ikigai III May 17, 2025
  • Ikugai May 9, 2025
  • Coalition to Rebate All the Daylight Saved April 1, 2025
  • Out of the Mouths of Superheroes March 15, 2025
  • Post COVID Cooking February 7, 2025
  • What’s Goin’ On ? January 21, 2025

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 373 other subscribers

Rooms athe Pigs Arms

The Old Stuff

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 373 other subscribers

Archives

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Window Dresser's Arms, Pig & Whistle
    • Join 279 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Window Dresser's Arms, Pig & Whistle
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...