
Written by Sandshoe*.
Funny, if that’s the word for my viewpoint from my cell, sorry college room in which I immerse myself in little else these days other than the study of careless and murderous intent described in terms of Crown and its judgements. Allow me to describe my commingled thoughts these last few days about specifically the Duke, that’s Mountbatten and not Wayne.
Funny, as I was saying, I was born in 1950 and I cannot recall the exact year the presence of the Duke came to my ken, but as I was reading before I went to school, I am guessing near the very most beginning of me. I recall sitting on my father’s shoulders waving a small flag as the Royal procession passed. That was the visit to Australia in 1954. I was not far older than three years of age. It is not a mystery why I got down to some really serious thinks the small past while. A thought wafted up like a liberating genie out of a bottle.
I am me in a large part because he was who and what he was.
Astounding. I was incredulous. He contributed to shaping me. I knew some men could be something like my father. Here an example was in full view on a world stage. He was sober albeit you do not understand what that exactly is, but by what it presents as. He was outspoken I knew when I was very young. That fascinated me. I saw him as brave in that regard when I learned he was opposed to the degradation of the environment. It goes on.
When I learned something of his history, when I started to understand the dimension of the political and moral dilemmas he witnessed in his experiences as a prince of Greece and a cousin of the Windsor royal family I felt astonishment at how rich the viewpoint must have been. I was a student of history and geography, economics, literature and later of the social sciences. When his kids got into scrapes and the worse they were with regard to immorality as we perceive it through the media, I wondered how much pain he must have been carrying, the worry. I had seen my stoic father walking with his shoulders back and his head held high through similar grief and worry. I had my own children.
I learned about Phillip’s mother and wondered about her decision in later life to choose a path of humility and penury in service to others. I imagined her influence on him.
Not sure when, but some time I conceived of the notion this man was so awed by the adoration of him his cousin formed when she was a child, he responded to what was required of him as a consort forever on that ground … aside the hordes, aside the media, aside Parliament, but as well because he understood this little girl. He in the first instance loved the beautiful young girl who adored him. He had no sides. I believe it is that simple.
*Sandshoe is Christina Binning Wilson (B.A. – History and Politics). Christina is a current undergraduate student of Bachelor of Laws (Graduate Entry) at an Australian University. She is a long-time contributing writer for the independent blog, the Window Dressers Arms, Pig and Whistle aka the Pig’s Arms. Nothing she writes can be taken as representing her alma mater or affiliates and no opinions she expresses are those of the College.
https://johnmenadue.com/prince-philip-and-gough-whitlam-the-story-the-crown-forgot/?fbclid=IwAR1M_YkjeGrtqFtbDNEskTwTr7d88p_AfovU2S2hm4b048Q19X4ngGLB3Rc
LikeLike
Lovely piece shoe. Like you I do not know a time when the current Queen wasn’t on the throne or Phil being by his side.
I am a Republican not a Monarchist, though Mrs A reckons I’m a closet Monarchist. Sure I have some interest but more in an historical context particularly from George III on and how their reigns moulded modern Australia. I’d give Royal tours a miss, but do admit to watching the Trooping of the Colour and lifting a younger Mrs M so she could see. I also remember Betty and Phil driving past near Paddington Station back in the day.
I largely see the Royle Family as accidents of birth, some who’s place I wouldn’t want to exchange for quids.
As I posted around Christmas, I’m researching my family tree. I’m amused by how many people try to connect family with someone of historical or famous, most of the time without any truth whatsoever. Most recent I found someone who had us related to a line of Danish Kings with a line back to the first century BC. Another had us related to Cromwell. Even a cousin (who is a Genealogist) has us related to one of the illegitimate daughters of Edward IV, possible but a big leap of generations without enough proof.
Now on the comics, Mandrake was a favourite along with The Phantom as well as Price Valiant (that one must be my Cornish roots) who is Nordic but set in Arthurian times.
LikeLike
Hi Algernon Hahha you might have seen the episode of Who Do You Think You Are that featured Boris Johnson and his entertaining story about his Gran, Granny Butter whose name I’ve never forgotten. who no -one paid a lot of heed she was “royal”, whose stories were a little garbled except she had some silver or china that was meaningful to her. The DNA brought it home. They took Boris for a stroll past some of the ceiling to floor portraits of the monarchy hanging in one of the palaces, wherever, threw him into a profile view against, think it was one of the Georges. The physical resemblance with Boris was laugh out loud, how could anybody have ever walked past it and not seen Boris. I cannot look at him now without imagining George III. 🙂
LikeLike
Well George III was mad, Boris shows the some of same characteristics.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beautiful piece, Our Dear ‘Shoe.
My Mom took me down to see HRH and Phil ‘but passing by’ – amongst a crowd I read somewhere around 60,000 strong at a specially made park in Concord in Sydney in 1954 as you said..
I was less than a year old. I think that was when my posiitive attitude to the royals peaked and my general dislike of the madness of crowds was born.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the beautiful collage you put together Mark. It did my reflection on the Duke real proud. I am as proud as punch too of this piece of writing as I am any I have written in any genre because it has a still and sincere feel of mature thinking.
Not to neglect that if Mums or Aunties purchased the weekly women’s papers in the day, my generation grew up with especially the first two children of Phillip and Elizabeth as surely as day is day. I think they were the the most dominant images leastwise I can remember.
LikeLike
Yes, those were the days when the press were worth two bob and there was none of the intelligence insulting crap that befouls the front pages today.
I remember endless hours spent in doctors’ waiting rooms reading the comic sections in those magazines. I was fascinated by the drawings in Mandrake the Magician – guaranteed one top hat per strip. I never got the stories because there was no continuity in random back copies of Woman’s Day or Woman’s Weekly.
Wikipedia said that the Mandrake syndicated comic strip started in the 1930s and only ceased in 2013 when the artist retired – mid story, apparently. Had to admire the staying power of that guy. If it was me, I guarantee you I’d get bored and inject some surrealism just to see what the reader response was 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting reading of your experience. It was a hell of a lot of people attended the ‘passing by’ parades up and down the country. I saw a statistic once that read as if it was nearly everybody. That’s a hell of a successful event. It’s hard to imagine.
It’s hard to reconcile as done by living, breathing people what was done to those weeklies speaking of intelligence insulting crap. We didn’t get around the countryside and see its wonders like we started to in the 60s and I credit the media my education on how incredibly beautiful Australia was in parts. Those full page reproductions of stunning photos we got weekly, Australasian Post was one, actually of our country and articles about flowers, trees, good god with similarly beautiful photographs.
I think myself of those Mandrake type strips as pretty well the essence of surrealism, who knows what’s going on, forerunner to Foodge in the sense they rely on a readership and a style, I supposed a stable of creators who reproduce a look and an illusion of story line. Nobody changes or ages or leaves town. Nobody cares much as long as there is a reliability about the style.
I occasionally catch a glimpse of the current weeklies where in some places they are displayed to tempt shoppers standing in queues in supermarkets. I seriously miss working in the media hands-on. I puzzle how low I would have to stoop to turn a blind eye to the content of the material I see proclaimed on the covers of magazines we once might have perused for the beautiful portrait of Princess Margaret by Armstrong-Jones, a cover girl seated on a rock seaside, beautifully photographed somewhere in NSW or by a talented photographer in Perth, looking at what they are has eased that hole I discovered leaving the media, but how could I tolerate working for any of these.
Dad didn’t earn as much as I would have imagined we would pay scientists back in the day, but when I reflect on this the weeklies came through our door as regular as clockwork so while we didn’t live flash, we had enough as a result of his employment. Four kids ate them near out of house and home and sports stuff and music lessons so Mum and Dad lived modestly.
LikeLike
Comment stuck in moderation.
LikeLike
It is now so unstuck.
LikeLiked by 1 person